FRONT GATE
 ARCHIVESECTIONWORK3  NEXT PAGE
SITE MAP SECTION
SITE QUERIES
 
SITE SEARCH

COLUMN WIDTH

 

Self-Searching

Centronics and Radionics
Anticipating things well is a task of wisdom.
What is fit is fit. Did you know some may read the minds of others and more too? A yoga textbook tells how to do it, but rather obscurely. [Yoga Sutras, 3:13,16. Or: "Through the divining power of intuition he knows all things." [Yoga Sutras 3:33] You don't have to be a Christian to train yourself in these things either. [Cf. Matthew 9;4 and John 14:12]
      Here is a thesis to explore: The inmost Universal Being, also called Self and Truth, knows tomorrow. For the Truth as Self is tomorrow's inmost Essence too (below are the premises]
      Be extremely careful about the moral you "log in" on through unions, such as marriages.

Contents

   Supporting reservations are presupposed throughout:


Helped by equipment

Big bird
Two albatrosses
If we are "stringed" in delicate ways, we slowly become aware of that as we become increasingly subtle, as a result of "flying exercises" and things we encounter in so doing. The "flying" we talk of here, is of the sense-less sort - another term is contemplation.
      There are many gifts and graces to be had. Long-distance ascertainment aided by equipment is not a fancy any longer. British radionics suggests it, and Professor Jessica Utts. For a primer, follow this lead.
      The Irish physicist Bell's theorem insists there are connections that "move faster than light". We prefer to look on that as a metaphor. The theorem was verified in an experiment by Alain Aspect at Sorbonne University, France. Thus, Bell's theorem appears to lend credibility to this:
      There is more between heaven and man than albatrosses, and interconnectivity faster than light - or far better: Connectivity also works independently of light - fair and square. From this a daring suggestion: Inside there is no space as we perceive it in waking consciousness. [See Thd]
      Ancient teachings of Hinduism and Buddhism solemnly state many of these things; it is nothing new, then. For example, the ancient Sanskrit Upanishads, typically marked by "Nowhere is there a logical beginning, nowhere a logical end", decree [Ins 40]:
In man . . . the Self by degrees unfolds itself . . . He knows what is to happen tomorrow." [Aitareya Aranyaka 2.2.1-5]

Within (this body) dwells the immortal Self . . . Rising above physical consciousness . . . one rejoices and is free." [Chandogya Upanisad 12.1]

Above the senses is the mind. Above the mind is the intellect. Above the intellect is the ego. Above the ego is [a] Primal Cause. [And beyond it] is the (unconditioned) Self. [see Katha Upanishad 2.6.7-8]

Paul Deussen: "Thinkers . . . recognized one Atman, one['s] inmost individual being, as the Brahman, the inmost being of universal Nature". [Ins 55]

The Self, That you are . . . the subtle essence of all . . . The subtle essence you do not see . . . That is the truth. That you are." [See Chandogya Upanishad 6.7.1-10]

Pure Consciousness is Brahman. [Aitareya Upanishad 3.1.3]

This Self is Brahman. [Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 2.5.]

By the rightly meditative . . . and the strong, he is fully known. [Mundaka Upanishad 3.2.4]

The Self is not known through study of the scriptures, nor through subtlety of the intellect, nor through much learning. [Taittirya Upanishad 2.4]

Who has achieved liberation during life . . . is then called "the living free [jivanmukta]" - Nikhilananda [Ins 62]

As Nikhilananda says, scattered hints are found in Upanishads, but no full and adequate information of the Self - that "dwells deep within the heart [also called the city of Brahman], lord of time, past and future." [Cf. Katha Upanishad 2.4.12]
      Engrossing "Ace Phenomena" (things) like these are to be plumbed carefully and well for a long time, or risks of error and drifting off can grow.
Finding the Gold Egg of Radionics
Conscious radiesthesia is not without fallacies if you don't pay attention to morality at play.
      Be genuine and deepen your conscious perceptions by good, transcendental contemplation. In that way you do not fall as easily victim to passions and subconscious "set quirks" in calm moments where you learn to let the Self express through radiesthesia, and train yourself in sensible, responsible ways through it. Radiesthesia has its old and new roots, many methods and fallacies, and there is much to heed.
      It is easy to go wrong in a field of research and study like radiesthesia. Modern equipment has helped many.
      Anyway, the long-run rewards may be ample (for those who survive).

To top


First linking up to your ability, then some questions and answers

Through advanced equipment the unvoluntary reflex-like movements of hand and wrist, elbow and shoulder can be amplified and investigated. And to what good purpose? There is a canon of literature on it already.
      One of the ways to use holy connectivity in old days was through divination. It took many forms. The judges of Israel used divination, and so did the kings. There is far more on this subject on another page. [Click]
      In modern radionics a pendulum is used to gain access to things. One of the methods is called Question and Answer, Q&A. You pose a carefully formed question and learn how to communicate with deeper or higher or broader facets of yourself by reflexivity of a sort. Then you take down notes of each answer. Should you feel happy about what you come up with?
      It depends. It depends on how reliable you are, in the first place. Common research and study procedures may help in ascertaining things you come up with from your own heart or subconscious levels, depending on the cases and who ask what in what ways. It is possible to pose questions where the good answers lie outside one's range too.
      This is a wide field of study and research, and the canon has grown rather large already.

To top


Questions

1. Is there one or many?

"Ekam sat", One(ness) is, is a famous statement from the ancient Rigveda. We must not expect to find the whole truth in a single tenet, though; the Vedas themselves are many and voluminous works - they are not one, but many. It is not easy to get to grips with this "ekam sat" statement. It refers to experience of an essential homogeneity beyond or above reasoning. Another way of putting it is "At the heart of the world . . . is Brahman . . . Brahman and Atman are one. [Ins 60]


2. Are your Gold Scales Teachings rooted in anything different?

Different than what? How much different? And is it different for good? "One who knows, rejoices in the Self, and Slaves know not this truth." [Chandogya Upanishad 8.3.2-4, extract]
      Well, on a surface level you may say much material here is rooted in cybernetics when it comes to displays of assorted tenets. The ascertainment of the tenets employed, took decades, and our school of thinking is very much integrative. Apart from that, not-notch outputs from various quarters of the globe are "stream-lined" in it. Good work has many facets. What is more, we rather often favour the alternative hypotheses in what we show up. That is what professional handling in the realm of science is rooted in.


3. Can hypotheses undermine deep faith in some?

Surely. But it depends also on what sort of faith we are talking about. A perfect faith is like what seeds and tiny, well-formed babies can have inside them; it is basically non-verbal, and it is in the teachings of Christ. However, word-given faith can assist and help some to walk ahead without blunders. A weak faith - one from seeds (even words) dropped on other than deep, fertile soil (mind), may be undermined. So if those who are poor in a fit and good faith feel weakened by assorted facts and wisdom from it, are made to fall by the wayside after finding thoughts that are not identical with theirs, maybe they should refrain from reading into this site. Thus, although we speak to the human race along general lines fairly often, it does not mean everyone.


4. Just what does your tomtom open up to in time?

Having found gold through radionics
Deep words of radiesthetes may function in very good soil (minds).
It is a good question, particularly if the planet is destroyed by a meteor in a few years or so from now. Maybe facets of a not seldom repeated "drum essence" should be given: There are ways to ascertain what they are. A "search this website" function helps.
      However, since we try to be very little intrusive by and large, make leeway for the rather stiff use of figurative language encountered here. For example, even if there are 27 pages at present (Aug 7, 1999) with the word "beaver" in them, the beaver referred to is not a pussy - and fairly often it stands for human id as a good symbolic item. The figurative use of some words pose one problem.
      Another is that whereas some sites on the web advocate things, and others go against things consistently with that sort of mono-profile in each case, this webside is different in this way:
  1. There are things we advocate.
  2. There are things we go against.
  3. There are things we expose candidly - and that part of this webside may very well be the main part.
This assorted outlook and the refined thinking of the wabsite sees to it that you can't depend on how many times words are used and deduct what is advocated on top of merely that. To the contrary.


5. How does your stuff relate to that of Kungfu Zi, that is, to the sage Confucius?

We take delight in some stories and good thinking in a large, educative encounter. And it may perhaps be necessary to read through a page to find out what attitudes might be held underneath the turf, so to speak. The best ideas behind one single page or page system may not be revealed until the overall effects dawn on you, if it happens. Allow for that possibility, as we may be very subtle on purpose, one way or other.
      This may be said expressly: We go against being taken in. So we go against tomfoolery, no matter how angry and fiendish we have made some fakers in so doing. It's most often like that.
      Much repetitive use of terse phrases needs explaining. There is value in repetition, as the repetitive elements in handed-over analects (dialogues) of Confucius have documented in the Chinese history. Tactful use of smart repetitions may give pushes fit for survival - that's one of the slowly found out concerns or ideas behind a lot. That granted, there is a historical forerunner (many, really) of that feat, and many advances to be gleaned on top of our particular tomtom ways of writing. They remind pretty well of one main way of presenting gist as found in medieval Zen as well. There are many other benefits from some sort of repetitive smartnesses here. We leave these educational and study-propelling concerns aside for now.


6. It evolved

It should be good to put one's talents to use and get something in return for it.
      Divination is a much overlooked side of the "best of the Bible" material. Modern radiesthesia and its variants was evolved in the hands of a French abbot and many, many others. There is much to learn in that field of study yet.


7. Are there great benefits?

That was a good question - Answers depend in part on what side a reader is on. And opinions differ.
      Not a few might benefit from solvency-assisting teachings, because it is rather easy to hammer out exercises on top of much of it. But training takes it toll - there is no denying of that.
      For most part we think we bring helping and savoury teachings for the assistance of the not yet completely outsmarted underling or under-dog. The underling may not be free enough to derive great benefits from being told how many things work along large lines. They may get grieved and troubled from reading what they seem barred from if they are stuck in the mud in one authoritarian structure or other.
      Science opens up to mental freedom pretty often. That would be good.


8. You have so much in common with Dogen thought too, or extracted Soto Zen, and contemplatives too?

Eihei Dogen (AD 1200-53) was a Japanese master of Zen, he was taught in China. He wrote down tales, and also teachings in a particular way. His writings have been analysed by Rev. Gudo Nishijima, and we have presented our stuff in a much similar way; some might even say identical way.
      But we have gone further than Master Dogen. We have incorporated much from science and other disciplines in an all-round format which is aimed at solvency-building and one or more "ways out". Also, the sum of very much is: We go for summum bonum, the greatest or supreme good. We seek to tend to some much neglected aspects of human growth (good, cognitive development). That is, we assist good thinking. It comes in stages, through figurative sceneries and the like. Good tales confain fair teachings that can be lifted and used for adressing topics later. Find it in fables of Aesop too. It's one of the finest helpers for those who grow up.
      There are good stories in the East and West, and North and South too. We cater to growth, and some good stories do that too.
      Now, one of the very fit attitudes in Zen for a Christian is: Hanker not for gods. However, we operate on top of a unified scheme fit for crisp and clear thinking. That sort of "stuff" is to be advanced.
      Doing Zen means: If you make wafers, you make wafers. Aware of that. Otherwise, good Zen means skill in contemplating without gods to worship. Such basic facets of - say - Dogen's Zen has been found to work well to the Catholic Church after the 2nd Vatican Counsil in the 1960s.
      There is much and exact information on this site for those who seek insider tips on how to contemplate/meditate. That part of education - along with the one that caters to growth of rich INNER and self-processed imagery or figures at large, is greatly ignored in most of the schools and settings we have encountered. We have sought and come up with a lot of antidotes to it.
      Good thinking rises on top of fertile stories from one's childhood. That's our basic ground. Waldorf education holds the same notion, and is in no small way based on it. Another is: Good thinking may be whetted (sharpened) through not-harmful diving (i.e. contemplation).


9 Why are your lessons read world-wide?

Why not? - Free e-texts and many likable paintings by decent artists account for much, and why not good reader taste too.
      We like what we're doing; much may stem from that. We seek to address a lot of people as our interests suggest:
      "If I can't write things that interest the Child in me, how can I expect to interest the Child (id) in anybody else?" This was much of a guiding principle of one of the finest writers ever - of Astrid Lindgren.


10. Your piloting essays, findings and aligned programs - why are they for free?

As for piloting: Even though the people of Israel was led by God and Moses who had been taught all of Pharaoh's wisdom, the people had to walk around in the desert of Sinai for forty years. If this sets a standard for transversing a desert, ha-ha-ha!
      More savoury piloting studies are needed indeed.
      Have you thought that there can be formerly unrecognised values in somewhat roundabout yet interesting piloting? - You never know. And this comes independent of what is called constructivist discourses - Unsurpassed teachings should not get sullied, not by followers, nor should straightforwardness and fair thinking. See Matthew 13. Jesus always used "roundabout" ways of expressing himself to the general public to combat Old Harry (the devil) [See Matthew 13]. We have not succeeded in following him completely . . . But we are positively Biblical, mainly and basically.
      Are these works for free? If the American proverb "There is no such thing as a free lunch" is true, they are not for free. But they are! And what is a fit price? Men argue over so many things, and estimate so very differently. As a matter of fact, we have not had to charge anyone anything till now, at least.
      We think it is a Good Thing that information is freely handed out if possible, and the Internet was marked by this attitude and shared vision at the start. It may be more mingled and muddled at present, but hey, we started out as idealists.

TO TOP SET ARCHIVE SECTION NEXT



Adjoined

Ins: Prabhavananda, swami. The Spiritual Heritage of India. 2nd ed. Hollywood: Vedanta, 1969.
     

Literature Layout SITE MAP First Page

CLICK on 'Literature' for the references of about 2000 works.
      ANNOTATIONS: Acronym letters in square brackets in the text refer to works. Click on 'Literature' above for examples. Page references are put right after reference letters. The abbreviation cf. means "compare". [MORE].
      SEARCH THE SITE: Click on the rose in the upper left column for site searches, access to dictionaries, and further.
      REFER to the page by its 'location' address (above).
      PILOTING: Some pictures and texts on top of the pages are clickable, to ease navigation. [MORE]


EMAIL Model Well's Disclaimer
© 1998-2004, T. Kinnes — Updated in Autumn 2004