|
|
"The ultimate Self [...] is in everybody in [...] complete Form". -
Lahiri Baba's Abadhuta Gita version, ch.1, v. 1
 | |
How to deal with yogi sayings? First be a yogi yourself.
|
BETWEEN 1886 and 1895 Lahiri Baba wrote twenty-six commentaries that
dealt with some delicately refined pranayama techniques that are called kriya yoga. Kriya
yoga consists of soft pranayama (mind-breath synergy control) techniques. Its main technique consists of quite slow and inaudible panting of a sort. [Ay Ch 26]
Kriya-yoga needs initiation. The training can be rigorous and tough.
There are several pivoting tenets in chapter 13 in Babaji Volume Two - Lahiri
Mahasay (the polestar of kriya). A chapter of the book is online on other addresses. There are 108 tenets in it.
How to deal with or understand enigmatic yogi teachings? First be a yogi yourself, and do not worry too much about the sayings of others. Moreover, we interpret some of them here.
Note
What is called kriya yoga differs from one school to another these days.
Lahiri interpreted many Hindu scriptures in the light of kriya yoga. He also recorded some of his own realizations. The first publisher of words by Lahiri Baba, Panchanon Bhattacharya, thinks that Lahiri's statements may not be understood, not even by genial people, unless one has
progressed in kriya.

 | |
Fair truths of plots seem to be unmentionable.
|
1. Kriya is truth, and the rest is
false.
There is much falseness in the world, in other words.
Did Adam and Eve really live without the fall from the garden of Eden?
This suggests it can be painful to think.
To study books well is normally a fruit of reading. It gives pain to some, but
alternatives to fair study may not be mentionable.
2. Practicing kriya is the study of the Vedas.
kriya is jagya [performance of Vedic rituals]. All should perform this
jagya.
To perform rituals is through ceremonies involving muscles, limbs, gestures movements and
so on.
And yet, unless and until you master solid cramming and elegant learning, you
might mar your fare if you just sit gasping and hope for the rest to come your way some
day. There are two extremes and a fit balance in between can be sought.
It's more often sound and likeable to build stepwise from bottom. And a sensible
thing is to blend at least three ways:
- A way of relaxing (kriya can be included);
- A way of coping (includes much more than ceremonies and pastimes);
- A way of sound cognitive development. It involves maturing and learning.
A sound balance is fit. Even a wild animal does all of it in his way, a way that
fits the animal. The one who is capable of development into sound and fit adaptations that
matter can eventually make himself or herself far more fit.
3. All devatas, [Indian] gods, practice these
kriyas [i.e. kriya rounds] One who practices kriya is a devata [it
corresponds to an angel].
Look at this: "One who gasps cleverly, artfully and masterfully, is a Hindu
angel."
You have a right to ask:
"But isn't there anything better in store than that? After all, Jesus said "you
are gods" and asked us to do even greater works than he did (John 14:12). Thus there may
not be a fixed upper limit?"
Too small thinking is a hallmark of figurative frogs. They are unrealised, grossly
stated. Why not assert the Bible-looking "I am who I am, I am what I will be - I am
myself, no matter what.
That outlook could work well, and it could also work bad in the wrong hands -
there is that risk. The ability to come across and perhaps also see what is truly helpful
is in part a consequence of natural assertiveness (which often is good and serves us
well); in part a fruit of cognitive development against being undermined by verbiage,
slogans and bad ones.
How far could gasping in set ways (pranayama) improve yourself, your inner being
included? There is more than one opinion in the matter. Maybe you should note that.
4. One should practice pranayam very seriously and
sincerely.
Lahiri Baba's kriya yoga is a form of pranayama. It's attuned to gasping measuredly,
composedly etc.
5. Kriya practice opens the eye of
wisdom.
A good thing may be turned into a bad thing, according to Jean-Jacque Rousseau's
"Everything degenerates in the hands of men." (Emile, 1st page]
Then there is Murphy's Law: "If anything can go wrong, someone will see to that it
happens - sooner or later."
Learn to prepare in advance to lessen future's bad happenings, nip them in the
bud, take the sting out of them, and bulwark thoroughly so that the bad thing never
happens anyhow. In some cases it can be done. Try it.
What is meant by the 'eye of wisdom'? It's part of an insider's teaching. Hint: As
you train yourself in the kriya way you may not keep your blue eye* perfectly intact and
open for long in the start. That would be all right.
* The circle of golden light surrounds it; much as in the left image above. Find
much more on the light and of the single eye here: [LINK]
6. The knowledge of Brahma, the ultimate Self, is attained
by the practice of pranayam. [By special breathing, in other words]
'Self' is a word with many meanings. In Sanskrit there are more than one understanding of
the so-called higher, more integrative states of consciousness as well. You should be
aware of that.
Brahma in Lahiri Baba's tenets is Father of Kali and is the ultimate self (Sayings
43, 81). Brahma is told of as formless and pure void, a great voidness which is a void
inside a void [as if that were possible] (76, 78, 83,105).
When you experience a void, you are someone experiencing it. Judged from that, the
void is not truly void: Don't overlook yourself; that is the hint here. Some call it
mystery, and some the Self.
The Brahma Self may be seen between the eyebrows and in the sun (Sayings 51, 46) -
it depends. It's beyond a point inside, that point is called bindu (a yogi term). (Saying
76) One should merge into oneness with the pure, formless void, which is called Brahma
(77) and how? By dissolving the mind into it. (78)
Through this channel, really clever gasping is spoken of as one of the best ways
to get to godhood, as explained in handed-over teachings. We just render and reiterate
main lines in a development.
7. Ignorance is removed automatically when the kriya
practice is perfect.
What is meant by "ignorance" here could include relevant, fair and good customs and lots
of other things too. Check a tale here: [LINK]
Or think about Wild Bill Hitchcock as you like: One day he sat down to play poker
in a Wild West saloon, with his back facing the door, contrary to his customs. A man came
in through the door and shot Wild Bill in the back. Then Wild Bill died, much contrary to
his customs.
One point is, in higher states of awareness one may cease thinking -
It is reported that Ramakrishna came out of such states without being able to
count full well for a little while. [Cf Gra]
And this is not to lessen anyone of them.
8. By the practice of pranayam, ignorance is
dispelled and knowledge of the Self reveals.
Overdoing it has its price. Neglect another. In some cases it happens that by the practice
of some forms of pranayama sanity is dispelled and knowledge is shamed. Psychiatrists in
the USA estimate that thousands of Americans have gone crazy by pranayam only in
California. Conclusion so far: There is a right and fit way of doing it and other ways. A
savoury balance that is fairly profitable and in-bringing, can be difficult to arrive at
and may be had a price.
Kriya is slow gasping. In some cases paying the price of doing kriya yoga
perfectly involves something akin to dying - not only sitting with unblinking eyes and
making sense.
Paramhansa Yogananda: "Master of his body and mind, the Kriya Yogi ultimately
achieves victory over the "last enemy," Death. [Cf. I Corinthians 15:26] [Ha
241]
Do all who kriya-die come back? The famous Yogananda didn't die normally. His
body didn't rot for three weeks after death, but a brown spot developed on the tip of his
nose. [Ha 478] What if anything went wrong behind that point?
Not a few of those who live may tell.
9. One who does not see kutastha [the inner Self
between the eyebrows] with the help of one's own guru's advice in this physical body is a
blind one.
It is held that normal vision is blindness - contrary to appearances. What happens
in Plato's cave is quite like it - one sees shadows on a wall.
Yet, did you consider that offhand-looking definitions of this and that outside
the normal repertoire, often suggest rare enterprises, and that those who deviate may be
mobbed if they are not extra careful?
More on kutastha:
"He was explaining the meaning of Kutastha Chaitanya or the Christ Consciousness in
all vibratory creation, Lahiri Mahasaya suddenly gasped and cried out:
"I am drowning ...!" (...)
Many distant disciples of Lahiri Mahasaya were aware of his enfolding presence. "I
am ever with those who practice Kriya," he would say consolingly to chelas (close
friends) who could not remain near him. "I will guide you to the Cosmic Home through your
ever enlarging spiritual perceptions." [Ha 323]
Lahiri Baba had often written to those of his disciples who were over-anxious to see him:
"Why come to view my flesh and bones, when I am ever within range of you kutastha
(spiritual sight)? [Ha 9]
10. That which saves one from the mind [restless breath], or
manas, is called mantra; that which saves one from the attachment of body is called
tantra.
There are many other definitions. This is to explain a little:
Mantras are letters that go together in syllables and words. The principal mantra
in Buddhism is om mani padme hum. Initiation into many
Hindu sects involves the whispering of a secret mantra to the initiate by the great
preceptor. In the Indian tradition, mantras are thought to be truly efficacious only when
they are got verbally from one's mentor in that way.
Tantra involves secretive practices and fosters candour by and large. Tantric yoga
is thought to tie in with Rikvedic penances. In tantra works that deal with yoga, certain
practices may get focused on a certain root energy (lust), awakening it and making careful
use of it for various purposes. Copulation can become one of these so-called "left-hand"
practices.
There are many stories in Hindu circles that illustrate such parts of 'the
dance', and we are the dancers.
11. The transcendence of inhaling and exhaling is called
kebala kumbhaka.
There are other definitions too. The gist: By gentle panting (careful!) in specific ways
that we don't hand out here today, the mind and body may be calmed, resting slowed down,
and that is the beginning of a process that in some on some days or for some time may
increase the non-breathing phases of breath between exhaling and inhaling, for example.
12. The practice of khecharimudra [bowing your head in a
specified way] brings victory over the senses.
Does it seem too good to be true? It is to be remembered that these practices are integral
facets of kriya training.
13. When the tongue is raised, the senses are
subdued.
If you try it out, you're almost sure it won't work anyhow. If that little test of yours
is not crowned with success, you could eventually gain a negative conviction: "These kriya
teachings are bogus (etc)."
They do have potential, and so do you.
The potential for greater things than lifting your tongue firmly may lead some to
building houses and dams, and others to playing well. These outputs drain more than just
the little tongue. And telephone linemen at work that try out various combinations of this
and that, they get their successes as well: Builders, players and hard-working persons
fall asleep eventually. Then their senses are subdued more or less automatically. Much
work over years make others drop dead. Then the senses are 'disconnected' strictly and
firmly.
The question is to some; "What have you learnt?" To others, "What should you have
learnt?" Lifting the tongue in regulated ways is spoken of as a short-cut into a
drowsy-looking state of higher awareness where insights come unhindered. So they
say.
The thing not to do in encountering teachings like this one, is being over-serious
and next obscured by the fact that it doesn't work anyhow. For there is more to it.
Those who lift their tongues and state that they didn't subdue all their senses,
they have at least experimented, and maybe prematurely. The question is
whether lifting the tongue in particular ways have the potential of subduing the senses in
combination with other elements. And there is the question of practice -
Those who play, next become involved in life's play. It happens easily that way,
both for good and bad. Increase the boons, lessen the bad sides - that filtering helps in
some ways. What about the short-cut to the drowsy-looking states?
Life as a play may lead one to greater knowledge of what works and what hardly
does. In not a few cases some things don't seem to work at all, and then - with not a few
modifications and adjustments - they work too.
To learn from errors is not as rewarding as learning from the errors of many
others. Let good schooling take care of that. In yoga training there are cryptic
teachings and not cryptical teachings. If the teachings are not easy to understand and
carry out, they may be cryptical or pocus.
Those who learn from errors have a potential for greater things. They should try
acupuncture. A good treatment session is often marked by falling more or less asleep
(subduing the senses). If so, it might just hint at a successful treatment in
progress.
If you haven't learnt the basic procedures involved in breathing or panting in the
regulated ways that is basic kriya, just lifting your tongue is not furthering much.
There is more that goes into it and is implied. If you now feel something has to be
done in order to experiment with these teachings, maybe you have become too serious, too
involved in life's play (lila) as well.
Standard counsel: Connect for greater things. Connecting the tongue with
the soft palate and uvula is a form of connection that doesn't seem to lead to outward
connections in the first place, but then, how can anyone tell who hasn't tried these
facets of kriya training? And long and well enough as a part of the integral, wider scheme
implied? As in life in general, sound development fairly often takes time. There
are also short-cuts many a time. At times help has to be called on for good things to be
manifested.
14. If one attains the stabilized state in khecharimudra
[fixed tongue-lifting], then he attains the state of samadhi [yogic
trance].
The baba tells that in yoga there are those who get helped into states that seem like
swoons, and that lifting the tongue is a part of that practice.
Remember it is not your fault if you feel other needs in your life. And why not
think "Regressions don't measure up"?
However, if that sound strategy of approach meets with massive resistance,
ostracism and even danger, it is not your fault in that case either! But you may have to
take on and carry the consequences all the same. That could be too bad. The strong point
to consider is what beliefs govern those in charge of you, or prominent persons in
control. Beliefs control others greatly, and achievements often meet with envy and
resistance and more than that. Adjust to your profit. We realise it's not easy being
alive, not healthily so either. But healthy interests may help. And being handy often
helps a lot.
It can be honourable to be interested in old memories, for they may contain
valuable instructions that otherwise might be lost sight of.
Interest in what you are doing is often a sign that others try to measure up with
you, nest try to advance in front of you at times. And if you don't pay careful attention
you may not be able to keep the advancement tricks of some others under control. Old folks
know that. Young folks don't tell.
Thus, find out who you like to help - for no reasons at all, if needs be, and try
to stick to her or him. Marry well.
In many forms of yoga interests lead young ones into the hands of older or more
experienced father figures - and then they 'marry' their spiritual parts through one or
more initiations. Thus a bond is set up - it started with interest. The bond may grow into
a win-win cooperation, but it may fail too. The question may then be who becomes the
winning part too.
The bond of union between guru and disciple is more than a regular marriage bond,
they say. This leads up to an old problem: Of finding out whether the Old Boy you have
married loves you and have united with you for that reason, or have done to do you a prank
to profit from himself and maybe entertain himself on your behalf in more or less severe
ways.
In yoga both approaches are possible, and the second more than the first. If they
insist that you should sacrifice and yoga is sacrifice, you are likely to succumb to
regressive endeavours.
15. One whose khechari [regular tongue-lifting] is
successful is fortunate.
Lift your tongue and become masterly successful, says the guru. The teaching is to be
understood inside its context: a well regulated training program with much else implied,
it should be fair to say. If ripped out of their all-congenial context, these tenets about
lifting your tongue turn into rather obscene guarantees, which were not their
intentions.
16. Om is radiant light. When this light is spread throughout the
body, all is seen; then, there is no desire to speak and to look.
The radiant light is outside the blue iris - it stands to reason in more than one
way.
17. Air [breath] is lord.
M-hm! Someone wrote us the other day and argued that "breath" in this passage is a
bad translation of "prana".
To this: yes, it has often happened that "prana" is translated as or rendered into
"vital energy", "breath", "air" and things like that. Vital energy or vital force, that
makes zestful, or is zest itself.
So it happens that "prana" goes for "breath". Can we deduce safely the other way
round? Can we be sure that "breath" in Lahiri's writing here means "prana"? We haven't
seen the passage in Lahiri Baba's original writing; but we do have the English
presentation on the Internet, which is as stated. [Link below]
It is also true that in old Indian literature the vital concept of prana is
thought of in a medley of both confusing and divergent ways (there were many schools of
thinking in ancient India too, cf. So.)
I understand that breath is Brahman [God] . . . Khandogya
Upanishad 4.10.
Breath is the life of beings, therefore it is called sarvayusha (all-enlivening).'
Taittiriyaka Upanishad 2.3
The problem is as already told: There can be many conflicting statements in the
old philosophical-religious books that we call the Upanishads. You can see for yourself if
you follow the links and
| try a little search: [Ctrl
+ f] should open the search box on the screen, and then you type in "breath" [without
quotation marks] and other concepts and even phrases as you like it. |
Could you puff and gasp yourself into a higher being? That is a question, and
isn't meant as any trick question either.
Instead of racking your brain, getting adequate background information often
helps. Good knowhow could help you to measure up and measure out some of your responses
better, presumably, and allows the old wisdom pieces to flow more unhampered - or aid
fairly different understanding at times too.
Observations of "staircase matters" (subtle phenomena) depend on one's deep inner
character. That's in the teachings too, as shown in the case of Naichiketas who visited
death and was taught tactfully. It's in an Upanishad.
Old Indo-Aryans were able to observe. They had ways to quieten their thoughts and
that surely aids observing things more easily. They observed own thoughts and happenings
in their bodies and in nature, and then searched into self-worth itself. They tried to
know the self from the non-self too.
You may have observed that Jacob's ladder up into heaven is a helpful image in
trying to make out what yoga mystics talk of. On the low rungs of the ladder we are plain
materialists, and say that air is physical, a mixture of gases, that is, elements in gas
forms. According to that literal-minded view, the barometer is a fine thing to have. Much
air gives rising air pressure, much "Lord" over you. Through the sensitivity of the
instrument you may observe air pressures at any rate ...
On a more inward-turned rungs of the ladder into heaven you may translate 'air'
into "life energy" or prana. That would be allowed. This way of thinking is in the ancient
Upanishads, where Brahman (God) is talked of in many ways that are adapted to levels of
understanding - in other words, to what rungs of the ladder one tries to express on. It's
roughly like that.
The term prana is translated into 'breath' and 'air', but it is not as easy as
that. In the organism prana covers many pranas, many sorts of vital energies. That's in
the teachings. We won't go into it here.
18. When one continues to refine brown sugar, finally it becomes
white. Similarly, continued kriya practice brings pranayam [mastering circulating, vital
energies] to perfection.
Look to Babaji - it could happen to one or three in a century. Or the other saving experts
are too unknown.
19. If one moves the breath [practices pranayam] always, breath
ceases and becomes tranquil, sthira.
20. The state of sthirattva, tranquility, is called
yoga.
On finding your breath about to cease you could get halfway scared to death. Every
little helps ... or is it clowning and too bad to enter the portals of death by non-breath
all of a sudden? 21. Practice kriya as long as possible sitting in one
asana [posture] at least once a day. Practise the best of Soto Zen
sitting, or harding sitting, in a lax yet firm posture with your spine non-bent. You pant
with your tongue correctly lifted, all according to the candid instruction of the cosmic
viking ...
22. If one strikes the door with the reverse air then it will open. This is called
reverse japam.
[That is, tranquilizing apana, the restless breath of the lower centers,
and bringing up at the dorsal center and then if one strikes (makes thokar)
according to the advice, then the inner door will open]. Here is our mention: If you
ever get a training and concomitant experiences that makes it likely that you firmly
understand this somewhat sophisticated instruction - very valuable it should be if Christ
is your door.
23. Having practiced kriya, one should hold onto the after-effect-poise of
kriya.
24. You will receive results according to your kriya practice.
25. If you feel pain [during the kriya practice] in the body, then understand that the
practice is not going well.
It says one after-effect could be pain. Another effect: to fly like a mass of
light through the air. [See Pa] A third is not-correct thoughts that become canonised for
no good reason at all. You'll find more of the kind as we move on in this not so rigidly
canonical text. The possibly dwarfing influences just might include (a) unsavoury pain;
(b) getting nastily foot-loose in unthought of ways; (c) seeming insane, perhaps clowning
and toothless. Is that to be your lot?
34. May 13, 1873 - Whatever one wants to do, he can do.
45. Aug 13, 1873 - Today, I became mahapurusa, "the great man."
60. My form is everywhere; there is nobody except me, and that form is in void.
There is no day and night there.
85. When one transcends basu, desires, he becomes dev, the Lord;
that is, he becomes basu dev, or lord Krisna.
90. Knowledge of the ultimate Self is to know oneself by oneself.
108. All realization is possible by the practice of the first kriya [method]. One
is required to practice strictly according to the instructions received from one's guru
personally.
108 sayings by Lahiri
Baba
"Lyrics" in italics by Lahiri Mahasay. You
could read the series of utterances and inserted comments as a klutz interview, or a
reconstructed interview (- technical term). [Cf. Wap, Anfang] Some notes are added
to highlight quite essential points, also bland contras.
1 In higher
unions minds get blank. What if the supreme guy doesn't think at the time of death?
THE WORLD is revealed from my form. I myself am ... the supreme Being. (No 47)
(1) And the supreme being is strong enough to stand by his word.
Whatever one thinks at the time of death, accordingly one
becomes that ...(No 68). Don't think of tuna and sins,
then.
And what if you think: "I am me"? Can you come back to the exact life that you
left? You will then become what you are or were, but life is not stationary at all, and
all that went into your self-images and orifices, would have to be repeated - could
it?
And what if you think of the invented, basically surreal painting of a nude and
the battle of two armies around her? What you will become is either that surreal painting
on canvas of brush-strokes, including the frame - but it all exists already, and forgery
is not always welcome in art! - or you might become what is depicted in it, an unchanged
nude, both armies and a static battle? And what if you become both the painting with the
canvas and frame and what it depicts in a still-life world - all of it? These things may
be told.
If you think of an onion and peel it, does it have a core that is your own
core?
The guru has found out. And he didn't put much emphasis on the first thoughts you
get concerned with right after dying. That might be overlooked - but the Tibetan
Book of the Dead and other insider works seeks to remedy much here. [Cf. Til; Dead;
Tiy]
Should all that you are really be changed into a speck of dust at your nose if
that is what you think of at the moment of death? We humans seem to contain so much more
wit, awareness and momentum than that one last flimsical, stray thought, and all that is
not taken into account - Eh, this was to say there could be secret dangers in avatar
teachings and plots behind them, again. Laugh in secret if you must. (2)
2 Thinking
about the extraordinary but only fancied, do you end up like that - extraordinary, but
just fancied?
DUALISM IS the root of all suffering. (No 64) I
know one more: Ourselves. We have to get into it or otherwise there's no dualism for us to
see. Experienced dualism could be due to the inner notion of dualism. (3)
Thinking about Kali I become Kali. Now I will be father of Kali ...
(No 43)
Such extraordinary, tall feats require mastery of some insider identification to
be successful.
Some aquarium fishes change their sex: Male fishes can become shes and act
like shes all the way - spawning not omitted - but with no chance of retrieving former
male dominance. These fishes ... Uha.
The old father [Babaji] is Lord Krishna. (No 94) (4)
In the ancient Aryan tradition stories of Krishna were dictated by a yogi poet
called Vyasa, to someone with a pot-bellied human body and an elephant's head on it
(Ganesh).
"Let one hat cover one face." (American proverb). [Ap 284]
The name Vyasa means a lot to stout and devout Hindus; lots of books from
antiquity are attributed to him. We had better not get messed up all the time in these
waters:
The Krishna presented to us from long ago may or may not be exactly true to fact,
and at times the term "Krishna" is lifted up and used metaphorically. Let's hope it's done
so here, for otherwise we are perhaps to face sinister death in the end, some way or
other. This is so because he says in Bhagavad Gita that he is death, and a fable monster
called Makara.
Such pinpointing digested, the old tentacle grip of religious, Hari-victorious
fervour and avatar submission should loosen up a bit. If the
transported meaning of "Krishna" is not clarified, and the word is served outside any fit
context, it may outsmart us gullible guys according to "Geese eat all that is before them
and kill all that is behind them."
The point is: "Krishna" could stand up as such a goose - perhaps it sucks or
nibs interest and heart trust first, and in the end lays waste a lot we would have loved
to own ourselves, loved to keep intact - who knows but an insider who has been into the
tricks and learnt by hard knocks without getting a lot smoldered? It's hard to
say.
It's easy to get outsmarted.
We often get the impression "Lord Krishna" is a hell of a guy, and he's much
referred to as an outstanding, finest person to be accepted and looked up to almost
without questioning. The insider use of "Krishna" as a possible state had from diving
inside (through regular contemplation), is not as easily thought of unless you're alerted
to it. [See Yv]
For these and other reasons, the good extract seems to say: "Krishna that once
was a man that lived and married, warred and died, is still around in some shape, even as
the kingly Don Coyote." But it may not be the case, no matter what they say or seem to say
when we don't have keys for understanding insider language, and lack figurative elements
for sound and good adaptations.
Many times sayings that glide along inside Hinduism, are left hanging in the air,
so to speak, unexplained to most of us. Is that giving honour to masters of the Bramble
Farm that says one of its aims is to foster science? It should be sound science, and deep
and fair enough science too. [Ak "Aims and ideals". Also: Pa 499]
3 "I assume
human form to confuse and spread plots" - is that the hidden but real-life motto of the
avatar?
IF ONE strikes the door with the reverse air ... it will open. (reverse
japam mysticism). (From No 22) (6)
I myself am Lord Krishna. (From No 22) (7)
I myself am Kali [Goddess] (From No 43) (8) You
can trust a lot tenets from the madhouse also. Some are much similar in outward garb.
Hard to see a difference where there appears to be none. Let's bear in mind the essence of
the Bhagavad Gita:
"An enlightened person looks at a learned and humble Brahmana, an outcast, even a
cow, an elephant, or a dog with an equal eye." (Bag 5;18)
"Ignorant ones, not knowing My supreme natures as the great Lord of all beings, disregard
Me when I assume human form." (Bag 9;11)
So what's what? One Hare Krishna verse insists the fair fellow is the equaliser,
another doesn't. We find similar, conflicting outlooks in the first ten verses of chapter
3 of the Gita. Arjuna says that Krishna uses apparently conflicting words that confuse.
(Bag 3;2).
One counsel is: "By Yajna you shall prosper and Yajna shall fulfil all your
desires. (Bag 3;10)
It seems paradoxical; it may even work. That's a very central Aryan teaching.
Yajna means sacrifice in ritual ways. There are various forms or activities. One is giving
up a lot, another is working for no winning - and so on. "By ritual sacrifice you shall
fulfil all your desires." It implies that desires are not good in the long run - say,
after you're 200 years - but keep that a secret.
Let's remember to sift the majestic utterances of a holy canon and perhaps do the
opposite of what we're endorsed to do from that high above - it can be called turning the
tables. We could to do it at least mentally, for the sake of argument and further exploits
in free will. How else can anyone aspire to become a top-dog himself? We can't comply like
idiots forever. Consider it in the light of old Indian texts, not only slogans for fishing
inexperienced North Americans. Krishna of the long epic Mahabharata caused a lot
of slaying - not few dynasties were wiped out, including his own: All his own dear ones
were drowned - Note such an avatar standard in passing.
As a really caring avatar he should have hindered nearly all the onslaught,
according to the built in premises of that fiction artistry on yoga. Look to the avatar
fruits (consequences) that are presented and shiver next, but only if you dare. Look to
the babe of Bethlehem - You have to be incredibly scared to be too afraid to shiver well.
(Norwegian saying)
The terrible goddess Kali [yogavatar goddess (?)] is portrayed as the most
terrible sight in Hindu art - well nigh universal night of destruction itself. The guru
that identifies with it, could implicitly or figuratively swallow the whole universe. That
should be the basic Kali feat, as it is described in Tantric texts. [8]
It could mean he destroys again and again, no matter what, as if by instinct,
maybe careful and cunning. It should take a guru expert in deception to do that, if that
is the case. And what is the salvation that the other great one associated with Baba
(father) is said to bring? In Classical Myths of the Hindus Professors van Buitenen
and C. Dimmitt condense many significant tales about Shiva - the highest god-being in one
set of Hindu references called Saivism. It's a cult where the boss is always right and
where the allegedly highest guy murders, kills - ruins all - and brings his seemingly
victims their salvation by that; so they say. The freak believes it. [See Clh]
See how mature that outlook is, how close to the Christian winner concept among
ardent martyrs. Uha. Do we want it that way? (#1.1)

- Things are not always what they look like. It pays to be well aware.
Kingly-looking sayings may contain the seeds of some nasty, long-run effects deep inside
them. Also, the glory of mere sayings could turn sour before you know, for having a good
life is a fruit of competing and going along, more often. Solid assets count more than
most people imagine. What often matters is what you can master staunchly on top of good
sayings that fit in locally, that are applicable. In those cases a phrase of Kurt Levin is
appropriate: "There's nothing as practical as a good theory". [Psr 21]
- Sexy or hit slogans from upper-class ranks may belong to very limited circles, and
recall the Conservative British government if you like ... But most often, if solid
evidence is lacking, it may pay to bid the tide, wait till the myth is cracked open by
a formidable insight - one or three of them.
- Interesting events that get well coupled with nice thinking often help by their
"intermarriage". Learning and doing hand in hand - just as Chairman Mao said in his
day. You may do better than him. How? One way is to stand of the shoulder of the
collective efforts of others - Education is what I mean. We have to manage this sorting
and linking mentally or skilfully, to stop being ridden like dumb foot-soldiers forever.
All the dear ones of Krishna were drowned - Note such an avatar standard and note
what happened to the people of the babe of Bethlehem to shiver well. What happened to the
crucifying people could even be looked at as a base or basic Kali (Destructress) feat. In
Tantric books Kali is aligned to Kala (Time per se). Kali dissolves marriages, makes
decrepit, maims, kills - who can avoid it if not the mystic who has grasped just how to
live on indefinitely - And feel free to think: "Do we want plots like the ones hinted at
above, in our gardens and lives?" That could be the very tricky question.
Ak: Yogananda, Paramahansa. Man's Eternal Quest. Los Angeles: Self-Realization
Fellowship, 1975.
Ap: Mieder, Wolfgang (main editor), Stewart A.
Kingsbury, and Kelsie E. Harder: A Dictionary of American
Proverbs. (Paperback) New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Ay: Yogananda, Paramahansa. Autobiography of a Yogi. 1st ed. New York: Theosophical, 1946. Online. [oaks.nvg.org/pv6bk12.html]
Ebu: Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica 2006 Ultimate Reference Suite DVD. London: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2006.
Op: Simpson, John, and Jennifer Speake. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Proverbs. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1998.
Pa: Yogananda, Paramahansa. Autobiography of a Yogi. 11th ed. Los Angeles: Self-Realization
Fellowship, 1971.
Say: Yogananda, Paramahansa. Sayings of Yogananda. Los Angeles: Self-Realization Fellowship, 1958.
CLICK on 'Literature' for the references of about 2000
works.
ANNOTATIONS: Code letters (acronyms and initial words) in square brackets in the text refer to works. Click on 'Literature' to see examples. Page references are put right after code
letters. And the abbreviation cf. means "compare". [MORE].
SITE SEARCH: The 'Search' link gives access to dictionaries and more.
REFER: Prefer the standard 'location address' on top of the page(s).
PILOTING: Note the clickable text links on top of the page. [MORE]
DISCLAIMER: Two disclaimers intertwine: [A] [B]
© 19982006, Tormod Kinnes. All rights reserved Revised in October 2006.
|