The Master's Thesis: Basic Steps
|3 1 4|
Such an all-round procedure can prevent mishaps. [Wrh v-27, passim]
Take care to begin well
Seek to employ good technical equipment: Time saved should be a major benefit.
To reduce or eliminate errors and much waste of time, think through these stages of the writing process and make the best use of them as conditions allow. The stages apply to both term papers, essays and theses. This list enlarges on the first list above, and supplies more details.
A writing process is not one of separate steps and stages, it is more integral. You will probably "leap" to and fro many of the stages on a good day, and during the period that you produce your discourse (written material) or whatever. Yet it is helpful to let these pivotal parts of the integral process stand out, because they reflect the budding process - from main ideas, arranging them, getting documentation, sifting, and making use of the best items - That is hopefully favorable.
It terms of effort and use of time, this allround design helps you by pinpointing the stark essentials that may lead to a rewarding process.
Also, there are usually many handbooks and guides for writing theses in different fields. You are likely to benefit from reading into them. You may use this survey as a checklist to see if you have done the necessary things for getting informed on a subject too. The general procedure works for almost any subject of interest. You do not have to attend school to benefit from it. Feel free to let the writing parts dwindle if you are not eager to write down something, although keynotes help.
How You Write All-round Fitly
Good and academic writing both include the art of presenting your case on any subject in order, with integrity, clarity, simplicity, brevity, interest, and with no trace of pomposity, as Napley writes [in Scw 35].
Robert Barrass further says that explanation, completeness, impartiality, order, accuracy, objectivity and simplicity are basic requirements in scientific writing, and that considerate authors can be marked by appropriateness, consistency, control, interest, persuasiveness, precision, sincerity, and unity [Scw 35].
Barrass also tells us to study published work by others, for "detecting faults in the work of others should help you to improve your own [Scw 35]." As a result we may revise our own work and arrive at fewer words, and, when necessary, provide observations and reminders that assist the relevance of the message. Bar charts and similar figures have not been used on this page, but they can often serve clarity of presentation.
The book by Barrass also gives good examples. They add meat to the bones of abstract terms.
Scw: Barrass, Robert. Scientists Must Write: A Guide to Better Writing for Scientists, Engineers and Students. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2002.
Wd: Swetnam, Derek, and Ruth Swetnam. Writing Your Dissertation: The Bestselling Guide to Planning, Preparing and Presenting First-Class Work. 3rd rev ed. Begbroke, Oxford: How To Books, 2009.
Wrh: Rampolla, Mary Lynn. A Pocket Guide to Writing History. 4th ed. Boston: Bedford/St Martin's, 2004.
USER'S GUIDE to abbreviations, the site's bibliography, letter codes, dictionaries, site design and navigation, tips for searching the site and page referrals. [LINK]|
© 20002011, Tormod Kinnes, MPhil [E-MAIL] Disclaimer: LINK]