• Introduction
• Words on the psychic realms

Main Visions of Jung

One has to remind oneself again and again that in therapy it is more important for the patient to understand than for the analyst's theoretical expectations to be satisfied. - Carl G. Jung, in Man and His Symbols. (1964) Essay retitled "Symbols and the Interpretation of Dreams" in CW 18: P.61

Also:

Practical analysis [had better be a genuine art] ... Learn your theories as well as you can, but put them [underneath things somehow] when you touch the miracle of the living soul. Not [reducing] theories but your own creative individuality [should be in the front seat then]. - Carl Gustav Jung, Contributions to Analytical Psychology (1928)

Understand, says Jung,

To be "normal" is the ideal aim for the unsuccessful, for all those who are still below the general level of adaptation. But for people of more than average ability, people who never found it difficult to gain successes and to accomplish their share of the world's work - for them the moral compulsion to be nothing but normal signifies the bed of Procrustes - deadly and insupportable boredom, a hell of sterility and hopelessness. - Carl Gustav Jung, The Principles of Practical Psychology" (1935). In CW 16: The Practice of Psychotherapy. P. 161

The bed of Procrustes is not ideal for rest and recuperation. To deviate well enough - in one or more proper, solid ways that suit you and so on, is a task of often overlooked importance. The process of individuation tells of that, tells Jung. What do you think?

Many thoughts that Jung proposes had better be considered speculation - or theory -, for the lack of reasonable evidence and/or experience that they hold water. Also consider that thoughts that go largely unproved, may or may not be true, generally, up to a point, or sometimes, under given conditions. So one has to restrain oneself and not be too quick to judge. A little reserve may come in handy many a time.

My views are grounded in experience. - Carl Gustav Jung. [CW18. 1731]

Politely: "What sort of experience?"

Goofs around maintain speculation. Some take it as faith, others as thoughtful theory - Hence, tenets that have not been tried or tested over - say - five or four generations in daily living, may at last be found to be faulty or of not so significant worth that it matters so much. It often happens earlier in the realm of science, where old theories are largely abandoned too, because they do not seem interesting any longer.

This works well: Let the one who asserts or proposes the tenets, also bring about the proof of how valid his or her statements are, under what conditions, and what are the needed specifications. From what "platform" is that credo-guy's utterance, for example? It makes a difference if facets such as these are checked and found not wanting.

Ideas of whatever source or harvested by whatever measures, need to be carefully checked before launched onto others. Maybe crooks and prelates won't do that where empirical know-how in handling ideas has its rightful place. They love to impose a faith instead.

Now, taste on this: In an interview with André Barbault that appeared in the May 26, 1954, issue of Astrologie Moderne, Jung stated,

One can expect with considerable assurance, that a given well-defined psychological situation will be accompanied by an analogous astrological configuration. - C. G. Jung

If rigorously held speculation is steadily maintained, despite lack of solid evidence, it might become inbringing. Ministers and astrologers worldwide may attest to that. Assertions depend on authority to get accepted.

Somewhere between good and firm evidence and no evidence is the realm of what looks plausible - at least to some. What remains to please a hard-headed researcher, is much and savoury verification of this and that tenet.

In fair science, wherever it can be found, the burden of proof rests on the shoulders of the proponents of this and that grand-looking proposition, hypothesis or assertion. It's not good to leave verifications of this and that onto the receivers, for many persons get dumbfounded by authority figures, scams or otherwise.

Unproved does not always equal untrue. There is a sphere - presumably - where one, some, many or all Jungian tenets may come in handy. There is no real need to become a believer, not even an investigator. For both of these may take time and money out of your life. If not, good for you. Listen to Jung: he says flatly: "I can only hope and wish that no one becomes 'Jungian.'"

The unsettled loom and the limited lab findings

Leading your own life is a lot.

Many findings that have been academically classified as just plausible, could still work very well in real life - that large, looming web we're inside.

What looks good in basic science and its laboratory settings, may fall short in real life, which is another scenario - one marked by much lack of control, not just a few influences, but many, many - and overt difficulties to make sense out of things or possible results.

Hence, thoughts that look good in the limited setting (where experiements are done) may not serve all people anyhow, or a few people. There are such chances.

Statistics is devised to help us handle odds or insecurity by strategical and calculating measures. One result of that sort of averaging business is that you invent the average man - he's just hypothetical.

And more important still, what appears to be valid in average, is not directly related to the single person. You can't deduce anything but odds from something that has been estimated (computed) by use of levelling measures revolving around certain "averages" to one person. That's pinpointed and deserves its saying.

There is an awakening interest in Carl Gustav Jung's ideas. Some seem increasingly able to understand his central points. Books on books on him attest to that interest. Jung has a very wide range output, and the main parts are hardly well tested, but for the MBTI types - a typology-based personality test that is based on Jung and has come down to nothing. We can also talk against the ideas behind his word-association test in the light of findings by the Buzan brothers. "The proof of the pudding . . ."

For now it is unreasonably to maintain that all of Jung's tenets are good or bad or in between; only that they are largely unverified, and one seems falsified. Carl Jung took off from Freud's psychoanalysis and established a sort of legitimated belief system in partial competition with it.

Jung on the Psychic Realms

"Speak for yourself," is fit.

"[This] stands for the rejection of mediocrity and conformism, and for the joyful commitment to life . . . - J. J. Clarke (1992:154)

"Critics have suggested [Carl Jung] failed to look sufficiently deeply into the cultural as opposed to the biological origins of sterotypical male or female characteristics. He certainly tended to assume that the male/female distinction as it appears in Western male-dominated society is a universal archetype, and to that extent he was caught up in the prejudices of his culture." - J. J. Clarke (1992:160)

A Few More Jung Quotations

To the civilized man dreams as a rule appear valueless . . . This peculiarity lends plausibility to the view that dreams are inspirations. - Carl G. Jung, "The Psychological Foundations of Belief in Spirits" (1920). In CW 8: The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche. P. 574

"Obviously it is in the youthful period of life that we have most to gain from a thorough recognition of the instinctual side. A timely recognition of sexuality, for instance, can prevent that neurotic suppression of it which keeps a man unduly withdrawn from life, or else forces him into a wretched and unsuitable way of living with which he is bound to come into conflict. Proper recognition and appreciation of normal instincts leads the young person into life and entangles him with fate, thus involving him in life's necessities and the consequent sacrifices and efforts through which his character is developed and his experience matured. For the mature person, however, the continued expansion of life is obviously not the right principle, because the descent towards life's afternoon demands simplification, limitation, and intensification-in other words, individual culture." [C. G. Jung: "On Psychic Energy" (1928). In CW 8: The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche. P. 113)

"It even seems as if young people who have had a hard struggle for existence are spared inner problems, while those who for some reason or other have no difficulty with adaptation run into problems of sex or conflicts arising from a sense of inferiority." [C. G. Jung: "The Stages of Life" (1930). In CW 8: The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche. P. 762]

Persona