Some need to learn to discern.
Simple trust in yourself should not be abandoned, although many sorts of beliefs that are implanted by words and phrases can be of value up to a level. But it depends on how odd and unsuitable such beliefs are. The faith of sprouting mustard seeds is said to be different, and also effective. (Luke 17:5-6)
A deep issue that much revolves around in life is reliance, or trust. There are many different teachings or guesses in the world, and different faiths. Suppose that most of them are wrong faiths on some points or others.
For example, some - like Yogananda say the Bible teaches reincarnation, and others - Bible scholars - do not:
Mark 9:13; Matthew 11:13– 14; 17:12– 13; and Luke 1:17 . . . If taken out of context, these passages, especially Luke, do sound as if Elijah was reborn as John, but when they are examined in context it becomes clear that John is being spoken of only metaphorically as a prophet “in spirit and power” like Elijah. In fact, in the Gospel of John 1:21 the personal (reincarnational) identity between Elijah and John is clearly denied. The passage reads, "Are you [John] Elijah?" "No," he replied."
There is a difference between interpreting a saying fairly - as unbiased as possible -, and reading things into a saying. Yogananda was prone to the latter approach, which we probably should know is unreliable. Further, in Yogananda's society, the reincarnation faith is different from that of several gospels passages, but see if various pieces of implanted Yogananda faith are fairy based. The contexts often tell things too, and many Bible scholars tell a lot of the contexts. There is good reason to trust good scholars above a faith-bully who gets a following.
Then, what could happen to persons who leave a cult? That depends in part on the amount of one's nightly sleep. The need for sleep is individual, but there is good reason to go for at least 7 1/2 or 8 hours of nightly sleep for most persons. [Sleep needs and sleep deprivation]
In Yogananda's fellowship there is a wealth of words about how not to go head - "no-no-wisdom" of a kind. Some guidelines are good, some not so good, and some are very wrong, like his "Hard work has never hurt anyone." It surely has; it has killed millions on millions too. [Statistical findings]. Don't be taken in by authority figures, for being taken in much, hard, and for long may change your lot in life. Sound education and wisdom to get along well in life, without getting infirm, ranks higher.
Some find life illusory and others find such doctrine unfit
At times present biology and other developing -logies tell us other things than Yogananda. How you react in such a squeeze could tell interesting things about yourself. Or about a church's infallibility doctrine. Some who seek mental health for gaping wounds inflicted by an insane teaching, venture into such as Bach remedies. Good luck with that. There may be other and better means at hand to try against simple naivety too.
See if you find constructive outlets, a purpose of life, and if your life zest or something takes you that way, a great partner.
But what does another SRF guru teach? "All is illusory. There is no doubt about this. People are mad . . ." [Lahiri Mahasaya, Abadhuta Gita, 2:7] Four of the SRF gurus teach much the same, but you may sense their teachings in the matter are of no worth. How? Ask, for example: "Are all Lahiri statements and himself included in his "all is illusory" - and thus missing?" Also, if all is illusory, illusion is itself illusory, as Ramana Maharsi stated. Again, there are differences of opinion; and many different opinions in time beget differing faiths. [The wise men of Gotham learnt to count in themselves].
This leads to another topic: "Is a dream a dream?" If a guru teaches "The world is a dream only", is that teaching a part of the dream or apart from it? Apart from the world? Or aparte (queer)?
It's no good to be "raped" by faithy mishmash, and thus opinionated.
Q. Do you believe that all writings/books in the Bible chosen (chosen by many people and groups of people over many centuries) to be in the Old and New Testament were of equal quality - in terms of divine inspiration? How do explain the apparent differences in the God of Love in the New Testament with the God portrayed in the Old testament?
A. (a) Of course not. (b) The key is "apparent". Having one's own son maimed and killed so as to help sinning ones is hardly that much to boast of - and besides the plan failed.
Q. Do you distrust your friends when they do something for which you can see no immediate rational explanation, or claim to have done something which you think unlikely?"
A. That would depend on what their claims were. See a story:
John Cremony was a famous Western figure. He told one story of a desperate flight from pursuing Indians.
The SRF member who asked these questions, went on and read some Gold Scales material, checked the information about Yogananda's changes of kriya, and left SRF.
McClelland, Norman C. Encyclopedia of Reincarnation and Karma. London: McFarland and Co., 2010.
Fuller, Edmund. 2500 Anecdotes for All Occasions. New York: Wings, 1970.
Satyeswarananda, Swami, tr. Complete Works of Lahiri Mahasay Vol. I: The Gitas: The Vedic Bibles. Guru Gita. Omkar Gita. Abadhuta Gita. Kabir Gita. 2nd rev. ed. San Diego: The Sanskrit Classics, 1992.
User's Guide ᴥ Disclaimer |
© 2002–2018, Tormod Kinnes, MPhil [Email]