Looking at things, like looking at art, is quite an art in itself. This page goes into the famous Renaissance painting Birth of Venus (ca. 1485) by the Florentine artist Sandro Botticelli (1445-1510), with a large picture to study too.
The painting was made for the villa of Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco de' Medici at Castello, and is taken to present the birth of love in the world. The vary long-haired nude or semi-nude is a Renaissance painting - oil on canvas. The figure of Venus in the painting derives from an ancient statue of "Venus Pudica". We show you one of the ways to study art through it. At the bottom of the page are to works on art. Much of the content on the pages referred to there are about Botticelli and his great work.
THE CENTRAL, deep or inner 'beginner's mind' is inside everyone that is capable of love-making. What is more, it could do good to develop it. Artistic training assists it a little bit. There are other outlets too.
PROBING and perhaps also asking tidy questions within limits can help us use our minds, imaginations, past experiences, our eyes and other senses to discover meanings or invent others than intended.
Sober questioning can be designed for individual reflection and group contributions. There are perhaps no awfully wrong answers. Fit questions encourage many:
The main topics below can be applied to most works of art.
It can work well to resort to a sort of visual inventory, at least in beginning stages, for:
Much allows itself to be observed tactfully and further explored in many ramifications Mind-mapping and brain-storming may be combined to further encourage creative answers and explore some of them.
Looking at Venus
Take your time. Perceiving objects depends on both training in observing and on learning about those objects. You can gain far more from looking at art and nature if you invest undivided attention and much time in it. For a photo or painting, maybe 25 minutes in one turn. How much time and effort you spend on any observed thing (phenomenon) or work of art, could depend on yourself, including the time you invest in training your observational faculties.
You don't have to look vital and interesting to observe well, just learn to observe cooly and catch big lines or patterns (sub-systems) at first. Have you looked at an observing cat? He may look half-asleep, even. Then go on from there.
Go ahead and just look and note things in your own way, minding no one's business but your own
If you feel you need schooling to appreciate it, think twice: for there are two main ways to look at things:
One way may not help you more than the other. However, fair and fit study is generally helped by both methods, which are used in such as literature and counselling psychology. The first has to do with Einfühlung, (empathy, i.e., "feeling into this and that", looking at matters rather naively, dropping preconceived notions altogether and so on). The other has found a grid of learned categories or concepts that are applied to the item at hand.
For good all-round results we let the two approaches work hand in hand, and don't lose any of them. THE WOMAN. In the picture the central area is a naked woman's female organs. They are covered by unusually long hair, as you can see.
When you "branch out" from there by following some of the dominant lines, such as body contours and further, don't miss the essentials.
She's standing on a shell, but may be out of balance - perhaps about to fall, but not about to run. She may succeed in getting on shore -
THE SHELL - what she is standing on - is too big to be from nature.
INTERTWINED, FLYING FIGURES TO THE LEFT: Now you may notice that the persons to the left are flying and puffing, if not hanging in ropes we don't see on the canvas. They are intertwined in such as way that the woman must be contortionist - and you could imagine they try to blow a dress away from the naked woman in the middle - but never bet on it. If you think that is the gist of it, you may add the Norwegian: "Pretty woman needs no clothes." That could be what they aim at or strive to show, eh?
Another version: "Pretty woman doesn't need jewelry." To some, that could be the crux of the matter, if unaided by what the painter had in mind in his commisioned painting, presumably. Are those meanings more essential than yours? Your opinions could be defended in certain ways. Here is one right: to interpret art in his or her own way. We just mention it again.
THE WOMAN TO THE RIGHT: You may suggest she has just received clothes that have blown off the naked lady in the centre. Is that what she is doing? Can you substantiate your interpretation of her? Is the woman to the right standing or flying?
GET INTO FINER DETAILS: There are flowers in the air. They could represent something. You should try to find out what, if you are up to it.
Many think the flowers around the couple to the left are falling. Are they falling of floating or moving upwards? Or moving in a circle around the couple? How can you tell how they move, if they move, when they are painted and thus fixed? Interfere to come up with an opinion. Take the whole picture into account for it, for details are best seen in their context; that's a good reason why.
DIE STIMMUNG. The mood of a picture and a scene is one of the rewarding things to feel into. One has a gut feeling, perhaps, and tries to draw it forth by way of describing it. Often allegorical hints are given through it, or comparisons. They may all be somewhat limping according to "The comparison limpers."
Martin Heidegger and architects more recently have tried to ascertain or come to grips with much imponderable moods. They are difficult to get into. Now, two examples:
1. "In this Botticelli, the (predominant) Stimmung is like an early morning: The sun rises, so wake up, dress up, and get ready for clothing."
Maybe you can muster another understanding through feeling a lot into the picture, through yourself, relate it to many experiences, sound and unsound ones, as the case may be. People learn different lessons, and people associate (psychoanalytic term) in different ways. We should allow for (and make leeways for) just that.
What do you see?
How is it all put together?
What is it all about?
What do you think?
This section applies questions from ◦Looking At Bears in Art. Thanks!
Janson, H. W., and Anthony F. Janson. History of Art. 5th rev. ed. London: Thames and Hudson, 1997: 443-44.
Walther, Ingo F., ed. Masterpieces of Western Art: A History of Art in 900 Individual Studies. From the Gothic to the Present Day. Köln: Benedict Taschen, 1999: 106-7.
Harvesting the hay
User's Guide ᴥ Disclaimer |
© 2001–2019, Tormod Kinnes, MPhil [Email]