Cults and DeprogrammingCults are a widespread problem and cause tragedies. American cults may get many members among shy persons (Zimbardo 1977). A sect leader may promise a glorious future, maybe immortality through kriya too. It may look like a "win-win" deal, enriching, ennobling, empowering and so on, until many hard facts of everyday life strike. Facts may be likened to ducks: "When I see a bird that walks like a duck and swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck." - Richard James Cardinal Cushing (1895-1970) Learn to identify the sectarian (cultist) and what sectarians do, and then you may help in some deprogramming activity too. A good diagnosis helps for prescribing a cure. Dr Philip G. Zimbardo hopes that No one ever joins a "◦cult." People join interesting groups that promise to fulfill their pressing needs. They become "cults" when they are seen as deceptive, defective, dangerous, or as opposing basic values of their society. A sect is a group adhering to a distinctive doctrine or to a leader. It may be regarded as religiously dissenting and extreme. A cult can be a small group of people marked by great devotion to a person, idea, object, movement, or work. There can be dogma set forth by its promulgator. Its religious beliefs may be regarded as spurious. [Merriam-Webster] The words 'cult' and 'sect' many be interchangeable. However, the 'sect' could be tenser and unpleasant for free thinking. Christianity started as a very tense sect of Judaism, one may add for perspective. Plotting sects and cults have many common characteristics. There are ways to deal with them; some of which are decent and fair too. Basically, to deal with them all right, just stay away from them. If not, there is a risk of ending up in recurrent troubles. And those who are able to realize and not repress their hovering cult member problems, may seem enigmatic to the "blinded", fooled flock of cult serfs. Well, there is that chance. Members of the sect that get aware of frustrations of unfulfilled or dwarfed lives, may react differently. "There are basically three ways people leave a cult:
Deprogramming of a Sectarian and Some of Its ProblemsSome enter. Professor Margaret Singer tells that three million young American adults between the ages of 18 and 25 are or have been affiliated with cults. There are at least 250 different cults - depending on the definition used, as many as 2,500 cults can be identified. They fall into ten classes, Singer says. Neo-Christian-based cults; spiritualistic-based groups; Zen-based assemblies; Hindu-and eastern-based groups; political cults; and communal living groups are among them. (Cf. Singer 2003) There is also much kidnapping in the States, and some victims of parental kidnapping may end up and "grow down" (get deranged deep within) in sects. Exact figures are hard to get. [WP, "Kidnapping in the United States"] Not all cults are "too bad", or hard. Some are soft-spoken with a big stick hidden somewhere around too. There are more than two types of persons who enter a cult. But for now: they consist of (a) those who are fooled into it by public facades - (b) and the rest. Many sect-tamed may not get straight enough for ordinary living afterwards. There may be little a side-lined or bereaved father or mother may be able to do for offspring subjected to sects for long, or very violently. A lesson to be learnt: The more helpless the sect victims get, the more easily they may be formed to suit the cult, as for example Patricia Hearst (1954-), now Patricia Hearst-Shaw, the granddaughter of American publishing magnate William Randolph Hearst. (WP, "Patty Hurst", cf. Brown 1963) Some leave. Among those who leave a cult, some may be well off for it, others so-so, and still others badly hurt. Listen to clarify if you can. In ex cultists there may linger underlying motives that twist and derange the overt ones. Persons who get drawn to a cult and accommodate to it, might as well get some tense, underlying motives fulfilled, depending on their character structure. Such a view is hardly alien to psychoanalytically oriented fellows. After leaving a sect, people discuss it on the Internet. Some fight the cult they were members of, others gainsay them. Well-meaning former members can also help one another to seek therapists, and further.
There is much that needs to be considered or taken into account apart from this: "It's not easy to tell about one's broken faith, broken life orientations". It may be extremely stressful. Lack of emphasis may helpDeprogramming may itself work as a form of corky mind control. Deprogramming is not an easy matter, and frequently needs follow-ups, because:
Deprogramming Understood SomewhatDeprogramming can mean (1) the freeing of someone (often oneself) from any previously uncritically assimilated idea; and (2) intervening with the goal to persuade a person to leave a religious group regarded as spurious. Some variants of deprogramming may be illegal and dangerous. [◦WP, "Deprogramming"] Deprogramming has proved somewhat successful with religious cult members. Depth of changes in attitude and point of view depend on the personality and motivation of the individual, and how supportive the environment shows up to be. [EB, "brainwashing"]
First Recognise Them, Second, LeaveHere are some points aimed to back up a less cult-ridden existence.
|
Adorno, Theodor W., Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel Levinson, and Nevitt Sanford. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1950. Altemeyer, Robert Anthony. The Authoritarians. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba, 2006. ⍽▢⍽ A much useful, free online work. Altemeyer, now a retired professor, produced the test and scale for "RWA" or Right-wing authoritarianism, did extensive research on authoritarianism, identifying the psychological makeup of authoritarian followers and authoritarian leaders. He sought to point out who the followers are, how they got that way, how they think, and why they are by turns so submissive and aggressive. He also collected data on authoritarianism among North American politicians. Altemeyer's work is extensively referenced in John W. Dean's 2006 book, Conservatives Without Conscience. Useful. Brown, J. A. C. Techniques of Persuasion: From Propaganda to Brainwashing. Harmondworth: Penguin, 1963. Hassan, Steven. Combatting Cult Mind Control. Rochester, VT: Park Street Press, 1990. Lewis, James R. Cults. A Reference Handbook. 2nd ed. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2005. Lifton, Robert Jay. Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press, 1989. Martin, Walter, and Hank Hanegraaff, ed. The Kingdom of the Cults. Rev. ed. Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House, 1997. Singer, Margaret Thaler. Cults in Our Midst: The Continuing Fight Against Their Hidden Menace. Rev. ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2003. Denise Winn. The Manipulated Mind: Brainwashing, Conditioning and Indoctrination. London: The Octagon Press, 1983. Zimbardo, Philip G. Shyness: What It Is. What to Do about It. London: Addison-Wesley, 1977. Zimbardo, Philip G. The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. New York: Random House, 2007.
Symbols, brackets, signs and text icons explained: (1) Text markers — (2) Digesting.
|
![]() |
Section | Set | ![]() |
![]() |
User's Guide ᴥ Disclaimer © 1999–2019, Tormod Kinnes, MPhil [Email] |