• Blunt Disagreements
• What Is a Cult?
• Difficult Words of Catholicism

Blunt Disagreements

- between Paramahansa Yogananda's Teachings and Catholic "Father Mateo"

From a Rembrandt that illustrates the writing on the wall by an invisible hand, "Mene, mene tekel". It means "You are weighed and found too light." The painter was excellent with postures.

Two issues on this page:

● Views of Self-Realization Fellowship differ from some of the Catholic Church
● Catholic views on who is the Son of God and on the human nature of Jesus.

Aims and ideals, are they good enough?

The guru Paramahansa Yogananda (1893-1952) was a Hindu emissary to the West. He founded the Self-Realization Fellowship (SRF) in 1920, and it has developed into a yoga church. Headquartered in Los Angeles, it is headed by nuns and monks. SRF states in their "Aims and Ideals" that their purpose is:

To teach that the purpose of life is the evolution, through self-effort of man's limited mortal consciousness into God Consciousness.

To reveal the complete harmony and basic oneness of original Christianity as taught by Jesus Christ and original Yoga as taught by Bhagavan Krishna; and to show that these principles of truth are the common scientific foundation of all true religions.

To point out the one divine highway to which all paths of true religious beliefs eventually lead . . . [Link]

First, there is no utter harmony between "original Christianity" and Krishna's Yoga. For example, SRF and Krishna teach the soul is immortal, whereas Jesus says it can be destroyed. Is that an example of "complete harmony"? The Christianity of SRF - founded by a Hindu swami - is veneer-like, and at bottom it looks like a Hindu cult, what we are deal with here. Some cults may be found to be good, others bad, but why on earth propagate a cult under false colours? To win acceptance by menial outlooks?

There are good things in the SRF teachings too, not just mediocre and worse. Still, it should be good to be alerted to flagrantly false teachings in it, so as not to be taken in by such parts. I am no Catholic, and still I have come across that "Father Mateo", a Catholic professor of Scripture and classical languages, has denounced some parts of the doctrines of Paramahansa Yogananda. Self-Realization Fellowship, headquartered in Los Angeles, now upholds the doctrines. The Father brings three charges that could be alarming to some, and good for others, as the case may be:

• [Yogananda's] theology cannot be squared with Roman Catholic doctrine. He teaches indifferentism (see below).
• He also seems to teach the Pelagian heresy of salvation by human effort alone.
• He misunderstands and even implicitly denies the Christian doctrine of Incarnation.

The summary is taken from mail where the Father answered questions till he died on July 18, 1996.

Letter to Mateo, and His Answer to It

Why not ask yourself before you go on: "What is a pope without his staff and robes and ceremonies apparently lifted over from pagan religions of old, aimed at herding flocks and masses of bleating humans? What is the bird without his beak, feathers and talons? What is a pope without clothes?" - I think "Nude" is a good answer, but perhaps not all there is to the issue.

What Is a Cult?

This chapter consists of gist atop a work by Rabbi Dr. Jacob Immanuel Schochet: The Mystical Tradition.

Watch out for the Theological Debris

"CULTS" stick to forms of faith or belief that are based on unfounded commitments. The narrow believer may be sincere. The doctrines the leaders espoused may appear noble. The goals may be many and have an idealistic veneer at times. Some strive to make them look commendable.

Nonetheless, if the commitment is devoid of rational foundations and with ample lack of valid "reasons for the belief", then those who like to live on their own terms may feel justified to condemn such things - the tragic commitment and false reasoning that many cult leaders live on top of. So what you choose to believe and how you choose to believe and stick to it further, may get charged with consequences; for some easily submit to some "members way" of life and practices - a foolish way also.

If the basic stance of handling beliefs seems logical, it points to how justifications of bottom beliefs are founded. Such "bottom beliefs" are of paradigms, "basic stances". However, if the premises and conclusions considered are blatantly untrue and the teachings are inconsistent, there is something false going on too.

Instead of Naivete and Gullibility: Rational Thinking and Handling against Humbug

Beware if some Great Leader repeatedly teaches seemingly whimsical elements of the faith, as he or she may do it to self-serving ends, perhaps with plays on devotionalism, which may be of human id (libido) to a great extent, and which may be hard to deal with unless straight and natural enough. The oddly gross and ill-behaved teacher:

• Is not reasoning neatly, but rationalizing.
• Is not really pursuing truth as much as odd self-justification.
• He relies on vileness rather than Sachlichkeit (being factual), when it comes to bottom issues too.

Hope to be able to investigate what is needed on an even keel in a practical, pragmatic way; do what it takes to get the training. Think carefully of the stakes before you spend and surrender much of your resources, time, money, and other valuable assets on anything. Substantial sums of money and freedom degrees may be at stake in the long run for those who are engulfed and become members that go out of their way to protect their common group of reference and belonging - the cult, eventually. Many members give up their property for the cult, and thereby allow it to grow and spread. Alas.

Rational people, on the other hand, make efforts to understand, to investigate, to evaluate, to consider with care who is a reliable and conscientious authority. The guru should be no life-threatening, whim-led narcissist behind the curtains.

Above cult dictates and guidelines an individual has to guard his main assets - they include social standing, well-being and all-round comfort. They include making good use of the time and opportunities too.

It should indeed pay to be trained to be rational, careful, critical and investigative, even in matters of salvation, the beyond, or Eternal Being (God). Good yoga allows for it. Science and scholarship too: endure scholarship!

Sanity is needed to combat blunt self-contradictions in the cult or sect, but hardly blind commitments in gullibility or credulity. Seduction that wants to save all - stay away from it altogether. Never let your so-called rebirth start a path to a suicide. Do not rely on the utter charm and whimsical promises and presentations of the salesman (emissary). You must not be called to make vain promises and ignore faulty premises just because of sluggard fervour mentality, emotional Führer magnetism, and the promised dreams of something.

All who feel drawn to the cult side of life should have read horror-stories of youngsters (and elderly) involved with the cults around, and note how cult people approach issues by dramatic overdoing, blatantly allying themselves or Great Leaders with the Highest around, or get seduced and brainwashed by stealth or otherwise to benefit leaders.

Seek to mould and shape both your Sachlichkeit (rationality) and moral stands instead of being pampered out of it. In a Californian murder case one of the defendants addressed the jury before sentencing: "What I did came from the heart, from love. Whatever comes from the heart and flows out of love cannot be evil. You cannot stand in judgment over me . . .!" Odd drivel or self-serving blunderbuss talk and obsession with ideas that are not first-class but run contrary to it, is a sign of a cultist, one of the crudest fellows of all. Your Country fists for enough matter-of-factness (Sachlichkeit) from you too.

❖ Your Country is the kingdom that is found in your insides: Don't be too narrow in your concepts, as "the kingdom of God is within you." [Luke 17:21]

Difficult Words of Catholicism

Below are easy summaries of what Father Matheo might have meant above by his unexplained theological concepts; especially "indifferentism", "Pelagianism" and "the incarnation". They are all defined in Catholic theology. We have got no negative feedback on the summaries that follow.

Religious indifferentism - a summary

Indifferentism is not religious indifference. This is how Catholics classify these things:

1. Absolute indifferentism consists of philosophic systems that reject man's acknowledgment of his dependence on a personal creator, whom he is bound to reverence, obey, and love.
2. Restricted indifferentism: In distinction from this absolute Indifferentism, a restricted form admits religion to have some salutary influence on human life. But it holds that all religions are equally worthy and profitable to man. Such hopers, like Rousseau, hold that God looks only to the sincerity of intention, and that everybody can serve Him by remaining in the religion in which he has been brought up, or by changing it at will for any other that pleases him more (Emile, III). That "all religions are equally good" comes to mean, at bottom, that religion is good for nothing.
3. Liberal indifferentism: The third indifferentism acknowledges the unique divine origin and character of Christianity, and its consequent immeasurable superiority over all rival religions. But it further holds that what particular Christian Church or sect one belongs to is an indifferent matter; all forms of Christianity are on the same footing, all are equally pleasing to God and serviceable to man. Rationalistic speculation has culminated in the prevalent materialistic, monistic, and agnostic philosophies of today, where liberals may try to regulate their lives as true followers of Christ, holding that Christ taught no dogmatic doctrine, His teaching was purely ethical, and its only permanent and valuable content is summed up in the Fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man. When this point is reached the Indifferentism that arose in belief joins hands with the Indifferentism of infidelity (the two first forms above). The latter substitutes for religion, the former advocates as the only essential of religion, the broad fundamental principles of natural morality, such as justice, veracity, and benevolence that takes concrete form. The Vatican Council teaches that reason can, by its own native powers, reach with certitude the truths that suffice to form the basis of a natural religion.

Finally

The self is not revealed either by the scriptures or by the instructions of a preceptor . . . It is only when the scriptural knowledge, instructions of a preceptor and true discipleship come together that self-knowledge is attained. [Yoga Vasistha, Yv 302]