THE GOLD SCALES FRONT PAGE
 

The Well 2

ARCHIVESITE MAP SECTIONWORK7  NEXT

SITE MAP SECTION
SITE QUERIES
SITE SEARCH
YOGA TERMS

LEFT COLUMN WIDTH
 
GATHERED RESERVATIONS   PREVIOUS A CONTENTS NEXT



Meet Unprejudiced Ones Too

WELL. . .
"Who little sows, little gets (Danish proverb)".
SOME WHO start a board may get disappointed or disillusioned as the conversations drift or wind along according to those who get involved and how they involve themselves. And some seem to lose interest in keeping the board tidy. There is much work to do if the board gets big. And an important side effect of getting involved seems to gain disillusionments - as seen by several "Walnuts", that is, "Walnut" contributors.

Find out what Yogananda says

CONSIDERING WELL
A Deep Well
It can be hard work to find out what different scriptures say and compare with others, including what Yogananda write about similar things. Yogananda says that good thoughts are food for the mind. Therefore let helpful, constructive thoughts abound, not the mean ones. So many "Walnuts" have said they wander in circles and get disappointed, and also disillusioned.


Sex-Monastics and Monastics

You have probably heard that "the life of a monk is not easy", as an SRF monk said to me when he was back "home" at the SRF headquarters after some time in India. Another SRF brother, Bhaktananda in charge of SRF's Hollywood centre said something that "popped up": "If you are going to live in the world you must work. But if you come here . . ." A third monk, Anandamoy, said directly, "Have you ever thought of becoming a monk?" - "Yes," I said, "but it will have to wait." - "I think that is wise," he agreed. At the time I was not fully aware of how wise.
      A friend of mine at the time, one who chose to enter the monastic part of SRF, later left it, saying, "I was not cut out to be a monk." Nor was I. None of us were old -
      In great Buddhist teachings Buddha lays out a careful, graded path, with some rules for lay followers and stricter rules for monks and nuns. Be as lax as you can; but you can draw benefit from rules for monks even as a layman. That is possible. What to do? Incorporate the suitable regulations in your life. Benefits stem from living in fit ways more than from ceremonial formalism with robes and decorum, Buddha and Tibetan Milarepa shows. Milarepa says,
MILAREPA SAYINGS
Give not way to misleading teachings that tempt you.
May I cling successfully to solitude. May pleasures of the world illusory not tempt me. May tranquillity of Meditation be increased. May I not lie steeped in Unconsciousness of Quietude; But may the Blossom of Superconsciousness bloom forth in me [Tm 193].
      Give not way to desires for distractions and vain frivolities — Talks of worldly things disturb my meditation [Tm 195, 224].
      I have never valued word-knowledge set down in books in conventionalized form — They who, knowing not, pose as guides for others, do injury both to themselves and others. [Tm 245, 253].
      True guidance and misleading temptations appear alike, but do not mistake the one for the other [Pray to know the difference] [cf Tm 299, 300].
      Carry the teachings into practice in your everyday life — Weed out all hypocrisies. [cf TM 270, 189]
      What gain is it to celebrate religious rites without attuning body, speech, and mind to the Doctrine? [cf 263]
From that you see that if you think you should live more like a monk, you do not have to don any robes and get overly concerned with ceremonial rigmarole. You can just try to live up to Milarepa's "The worthiest one is engaged in turning a blessed human life to the best account [cf Tm 225]."
      Speaking of formalism, if you go on year after year without mates and buddies and in the long run you lose virility, then you may seem ready to become a monk formally. This outlook brings us to the ancient Hindu ashramas (life stages), where the phase of being monkish is the last before death overtakes us. That is a real-life scenario of how a monk should be: Almost dead (to the world), at least when it comes to having sex far and wide.
      Hindus traditionally divide life into four main stages. And to add to it: In Vedic times there were only three such stages, and eating meat was not prohibited. But letting such issues rest for now, here is more:
YOGANANDA In ancient times . . . the individual practiced self-discipline [and a wide-ranging education with martial arts too] up to the age of twenty-four; then, with character formed, he entered family life. Later, giving half of his worldly possessions to his children and the other half to his guru's hermitage, the man (often with his wife) retired to the guru's place in the forest. The fourth and final ashram or disciplinary state of life consisted of complete renunciation of all worldly ties; the man and his wife would become homeless ascetics, wandering over India to receive the veneration of all householders and to bestow their blessings of light on all receptive hearts.
      Such was the fourfold path of life pursued by the ordinary man of Vedic India. - Yogananda, Self-Realization Magazine, 1950.
Some parts of the above look idyllised to me, like "veneration of all householders", and not "eaten by wild animals on wanderings through the jungles", but, anyway, the outline is there, and it stands out that the last life stage is aligned with leaving the world for good. And renunciation is a good part of it.


Four Hindu Stages of Life

First, let us define some more central terms: The sex monastic is a monastic that has not dropped having sex and auto-sex. The ex monastic is a former monastic. One may become an ex monastic by dying or quitting. Then we have the moanastic that moans. He can be a monastic and a sex monastic. He does not even have to be a monastic, just someone having sex or moaning for other reasons, such as getting old. The sex moanastic can be just about anyone who has reached puberty or adulthood.
      These things made clear, some monastics tend to think down on sex moanastics and sex monastics. There is no biologically necessary reason for that, since the life stage of being a monastic seems so close to being dead. And the sexual abstinence tied in with being a monastic, is fairly clumsy. Not all monastics are formally bound to it and enjoy it. The question is what has been set up for all to follow or adjust to.
      But a human is a sexual being, begotten by sex, entering the world through sexual organs, and when the id (libido, zest) leaves him, there is a problem. And those who look down on women may have forgotten their mothers and fathers too, and so on.
      Hindu scriptures spell out four stages of life (ashrams), and duties of each stage.
  1. Childhold is for play and fun and a little well adapted teaching.
  2. Adolescence is for studying thoughts to live by, gaining know-how of how to handle the needed things in a normal life, and so on.
  3. Adulthood is for getting wed and for having children and support the rest, after all. The householder or breadwinner "carries them all on his back".
  4. Retirement is for getting deeper and favouring one's dear ones and making the best out of what is left and right -
It should work well to adhere to some pliant, basic scheme like that. Now, in addition to the four stages, Hindu scriptures divide persons into four layers, or castes according to how bright they are. First comes the casteless - hundreds of millions.
  1. The lowest caste is the sudra caste of manual workers.
  2. The next caste bargains, deals in trade, money-making, and gets richer day by day if things go well. It is mercantile, like the West is becoming.
  3. The third caste is for statesmen. They stage strifes and wars and order and meritorious living.
  4. The fourth caste is for the fully grown information-getters and -seekers and -finders, in other words the well-educated ones. They are supposed to be gates of higher outlooks, after all.
We may gradually ascend to being well cultivated citizens, not rude and uncultivated, not barbarious and bigoted, not too fond of money only, or for plain society-given merits. There are higher goals than that. Abraham Maslow suggests many of them in his books. Personal and spiritual development can take some time for some; the important thing is to keep on going and not lose sight of that there may be more suitable and even higher values. And inner and outer development has to be combined for each to work well. One needs to be firm. A quickly ascending soul may be hated for it. That's in the teachings.


On SRF Monasticism

Eric Dwight Ben-Meir (alias Sankara Saranam) was an SRF monastic who left and got married with a child. Eric has this to say about other monastics who left SRF:
SOMEONE: You stated that those on the Walnut Board are biased. [. . .]

SS: "The real problem with ex-SRF monks is that they are writing to people who do not have an insider's perspective. [. . .] This is the bias. [. . .] After reading much of the material and considering it [. . .] I saw unconstructive gossip, bias, and spleen venting. [. .. ] I saw the same in Ananda literature, [. . .] most people involved in the discussion are not trained in [. . .] mathematics, philosophy, and the historical study of religion. They are simply people". (Sankara Saranam) [. . .].

It could help to know why the many monastics left like that [one third of them left SRF in 2000], all of a sudden. The knowledge could benefit others, but preferably not cult-serving ones. Has anyone sought to systematise the exodus monastics' reasons for leaving?
They left for all the reasons that were written up in that series of articles that appeared in the New Times LA.
      The long answer: the exodus had been brewing under the surface. The Internet that came and changed everything in our lives, also made its pact felt in SRF. People were talking. News was coming out. There were leaks [and] stories.
      Ananda people were out spreading their gospel about the wrongdoings of SRF. They were working the internet boards, telling people about the SRF lawsuits over a decade. The changes to PY's teachings. The forgeries, signature changes, airbrushing of pictures and history, etc.
      Then the New Times articles dropped like a hundred atomic bombs. Until now NOBODY knew, not even most monastics, what had really been going on behind the ramparts of 3880 San Rafael [SRF international headquarters]. The mansions. The illegitimate children. The duplicity. The abuse. The dysfunction. The secrecy. The lawsuits. The high-powered million-dollar attorneys. The biggest secret of all: [The SRF Leader] Daya Mata hadn't lived in MW [Mount Washington] for over 30 years and nobody even knew, even the monastics!
      All this sent tidal waves throughout the membership and the ashrams. Copies of the New Times were smuggled into MW and the other ashrams. People were talking. At the temples. In the ashrams. In hushed tones. [To many] monastics the farce was too painful to keep up.
      In the end, the year 2000 was the beginning of the fall. Monastics were secretly plotting their escape. Many knew what the others were up to. For some it was a collusion. They planned their escape together. For others they could no longer stand to be in a place that
  • was no longer conducive to spiritual advancement,
  • no longer lived by the now held ideals and the ideals of its founder,
  • was abusively and severely repressive and dysfunctional and and did not turn out to be the heaven they thought it would be.
It was a shakeup that was long overdue. [Extracts]

Great Walnut Issues

A few Things to Learn from the Walnut Board

Q. How can we use Walnut Board postings to our benefit?

THE BULKY Walnut is focused on SRF and SRF teachings. Some of its postings tell a bit. However, someone there said that at least parts of the Walnut Board look like a swamp.
      What we learn well we should accommodate to. Reduce the risk of failures: Take a look at the Walnut Board and observe things without preconceived notions. There is too much to look into. Yet it should be possible to learn something from the over-all fate of the Walnut Board in some ways, and implement things that help a more decent fare.

Q. "What more is there to talk about?"

*There is hardly any limit.
      The Hornet's Nest of troubles that Yogananda thought so many organisations would be (Autobiography) - and he created his own nest - should ideally nurture winning activity and cater to (some) higher truths.

Q. How can our integrity see more and better?

The ability to see and understand depends in no small part on plain willingness. Also, the ability to see (study, observe) can be trained or nurtured. And so can many of the ways of success.
      To nurture success is to assist character.
      Also, a boring life-style - if solid and well founded - may nurse many future leaders, including those who eventually become great teachers and gurus.
      This is in conformity with the old Vedic student ashrama (life stage) too.
      Walnut Board committee members and others of the Yogananda cult can get problems in the face of well-founded information. However, fair ones have to tackle decent critique to appear normal, and one is to deal with basic problems and information concerning Yogananda too - not only the institution he started. Most Yogananda's followers would say he still rides - as he wrote in his poems he would.


Foretold, but . . .

Yogananda once foretold that by 2000 USA and India would lead the world. It was not a hit.

NOTE: This is the sort of information that could give avid old cult members stres and a need to explain away things too. Below is more that goes into that topic:


The Sharing of Responsibility

Yogananda' share of the responsibility ties in with:
  • He started it;
  • He is still involved, according to fluent promises and quotes.
This point - that he is still into it, alive and licking - seems awfully neglected.


Resolving Stress from Conflicting Views and Plots Around

There are dangers in undiscussed, important topics for a society. Below is clarifying help; it is rooted in research.
So, there are conflicting outlooks about the Self-Realization Fellowship teachings, the value of the present leaders and so on . . . Below is information I have found about the possible BAD STRESS of being a member. I have preferred to make the stuff seem general, after all . . . :
      We may lie down on a coach. Relax. Take a few deep breaths too, if we like, and don't think of anything for a few seconds. Then we bear in mind that what is given here is just a general description of how to get to grips with some forms of stress, and with adaptation-caused stress mainly. Relaxing and trying to reach non-judging awareness is good in counseling therapy too. I have suggested a few things from it that are helpful far and wide [see Bai, Kurt: Livet og Pengene (Life and Money) Vol. 5. Oslo, 1981, p. 91.].
      We may begin this stress study with an optimistic attitude - and any 'you' below is also me and anyone else it fits too, for it is meant to be general.


Going for Gains . . .

Think of how you yourself may gain from the knowledge that is found, and not exactly how YOU may eventually get hundreds of unpaid workers (with a devotee syndrome) to help you out by playing complementary parts to desires of grandeur - or whatever [Bai (op. cit.), p. 95, 97.]
      The Russian researcher Dr. Ivan Semyonovich Khorol has defined stress in step with a definition by Dr. Hans Selye:
      Biological stress is the organism's general reaction to any demand to it - whether pleasant or unpleasant - which demands adaptation to a new situation. - Ivan Semyonovich Khorol [Bai (op. cit.). p. 99.]
      Such stress can be brought about my many things and stress can be many things: "Good stress" is even called one of the spices of life as you try for good gains. But when the burdens exceed the ability to cope at any time, stress becomes detrimental to health. "Chronic stress can contribute to physical disorders, such as ulcers and heart disease, and can increase our vulnerability to infectious diseases by impairing the functioning of the body's immune system." [Atkinson, Richard and others: Introduction to Psychology. 9th ed. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, San Diego. 1987, p. 486 (?)]
      The biological stress mechanism has these four stages:
  1. The alarm reaction (fright, fight, or flight).
  2. Adaptation.
  3. Depletion - through protracted, stressful adaptation.
  4. The energy for adaptations may stop [see Bai (op. cit.). p.100.]
We often get exposed to intense stress that demands more adaptation energy than normally, and then the organism emits what Dr. Selye calls a "distress signal", one or more "maydays" of some sorts [Bai (op. cit.). p. 102.]
  1. Even minor stress may wear on us and wear us out if it goes on for long. Protracted stress of such as mild and medium intensity may wear on the organism and also cause (or co-cause) functional disorders.
  2. Intense stress may cause hypertension, stomach ulcers and diabetes and many other common ailments. Medical experts today seem to agree that over 50% (estimates may range between 50 and 70%) of the common bodily diseases are caused or co-caused by stress.
Sources here: [Bai (op. cit.). p. 102-3, also see Atkinson, Richard and others: Introduction to Psychology. 9th ed. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, San Diego. 1987, p. 471.]

In Murky Waters

Dr. Khorol holds that there are norms of social behaviour, and some are deeply ingrained in the culture by traditions. When someone senses a discrepancy (gap, deviation) between what he is used to (habituated into) regard as normal or common or appropriate, his social adaptation mechanisms will drive or urge him to try and change the situation. That is ONE outlet. Another is introverted, guilt-ridden too, perhaps [Bai (op. cit.). p. 103.]
      The difference between the ideal and what is really going on may be awfully hard on the urge to make a consistent world picture, or it may be hard on one's sense of belonging. In Dr. Gordon Allport's view, a truly religious attitude contains both elements: a sense of belong in a world that makes deep sense. "The religious sentiment . . . has attachments to the most elusive facets of becoming. . . To feel oneself meaningfully linked to the whole of Being". [Allport, Gordon: Becoming: Basic Considerations for a Psychology of Personality. Yale UP, New Haven. 1955. Repr. 1966, p 93-94.
      It may be dangerous to get involved in religious assertions or conflicts for many reasons. In any such conflict one may try to (1) change one's society (in-group, or e.g. SRF), or, if that doesn't work, (2) one abides by the present status quo and renounces on one's ideals. It can make you feigning, which in the long run turns into neuroticism, and one may become cynical from giving up proper assertiveness, idealism, and other assets.

Faith in Conformist Gains is a Wonder and Danger

One has to have enough faith in and confidence in oneself. One should not renounce heartfelt norms and ideals (idealism) for the sake of conformist gains, after all [see Bai (op. cit.). p. 105.]
      However, in religious settings such CONFLICT STRESS can become intense and aggravate one's health if the gap between the ideal (teachings, etc.) and what is planted as "official", may get too wide and bad and it is felt to be important. Then members may be in for frustrations, especially those members who are committed and also able to think thoughts of their own, observe first-hand, and are firm enough to deal with possible guilt for going against the underhand expected conformism. Different variants of stress may combine, and persons may break [Bai (op. cit.). p. 103-5]

Hints of Stress Levels Help

Drs. Thomas H. Holmes and Richard H. Rahe at Washington Medical School devised a scheme of stressors. It is much used.
      Death of spouse is stipulated to be the worst thing that could happen (stress-wise). It is given 100 points. Wedding is given 50 points as the middle of the scale, in comparison. It appears that about 10 of the 14 worst stressors (stress agents, stress causes) link up with having a family. There are different sorts of families. Not all are good.
      To the degree that SRF is taken to be our family, and gurus are looked on as godly spouses, we can be in for trouble, even serious, stressing adaptation trouble: If you discover solid differences between what is taught (inconsistencies of teachings included), and between what is maintained in authentic teachings and what is steadily promoted through works, doings, PR and the like, you have to face a conflict better than the ostrich when it puts its head in a hole or a bush. Some on this board have "been there" too, and not only myself.
      The more faith and intense belongingness you invested in SRF and its world, the more a discrepancy between what was accepted and incorporated in you in good faith and what is seen and felt in time, could maim and hurt. Some, who eventually break loose some way or other, MAY NOT WANT TO LIVE ON, even. I suggest their faith has been tampered with. Think of that.
      And of those who choose conformity instead of standing up for themselves somewhat, are in reality ridiculed by leaders eager to have their way.

Illness Predictions Too

The stress scale is further used to predict the odds of getting ill or even die - in this way:
      Add the stressors you have experienced during the last 12 months:
  1. With a total score of less than 150, there is "merely" 37% chance of getting ill (from that past stress) in the next 2 years.
  2. With a total score between 150 and 300 points, the chance of getting ill is 51% in the coming two years.
  3. With a total score above 300 you may have 80% change of getting ill in the next two years.
All these figures should be considered to be rough estimates only, for real life is not as clear-cut as that. [see Bai (op. cit.). p. 106-7, and Atkinson, Richard and others: Introduction to Psychology. 9th ed. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, San Diego. 1987, p. 468.]

Clear-Cut: Coping Knowledge and Stress Knowledge Increase our Odds of Survival and Success

  1. Some individuals are naturally more able to withstand stress (more stress-resistant) than average, and the points about are average stipulates only.
         
  2. Further, learning about stress and how to cope with it, increases the odds of maintaining health and of survival as well.
These things should be done to combat the effects of insincere leaders in a family of a sort. In a fine and functional family, one of the goals is to shield member autonomy and help the children on and up to become functional on their own. That "family outlook" is often forgotten in cults, I regret to say.
      To realize yourself in your work is nice. To try for that is often a boon. Now, are you jolly - from inside? It could be a hallmark of being well adapted - in the mainstream or not in the mainstream [see Bai (op. cit.). p. 93, 95.]

NOTE: Later studies focus somewhat differently, by the use of other concepts. But the Rahe-Holmes scale is there still, and the issues exposed above are hardly ever contradicted. - TK


Regretting Being a Lousy Christian

To be a Christian is to be sick. Being sick is regrettable, like being herded.
TO BE Christian is to be a member of what once started as a sect, one with millions of killed members. "It has not rained; the Christians are to blame," said Romans as they martyrized millions. Even Jesus said his followers needed to be sick, sinners, and needed a doctor. It stands out here:
FACE Jesus said, "It's not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick . . . go and learn what this means: "I desire . . . not sacrifice." . . . "I haven't come to call the righteous, but sinners." [Matt 9:12-13, excerpts]
HEUREKA
Duckmite instead of seeing the doctor for the bump in the head.
      Much difficulty with sustaining concentration when you read sensible material is an experience that many former members of cultic groups report. Thus, please reflect on our thoughts for days. Our thoughts are presented with sensitivity if not the respect that you feel awkward gurus deserve. Still, keep in mind that "the message received is not necessarily the message sent." So double-check to see you have got the meaning intended, and be aware of possible double meanings here and there too.
      Age takes its toll although you may have many good qualities and a warm heart. Let me assert what I would like to think are primary assets: Being free from whims; a good character; a wish to be great and good; ability to achieve; purity of mind that sets free, allied to sincerity; and a creative spirit, which gives you the potential to adapt flexibly (to me too).
      Many ex-members of cult begin to rebuild their lives in their late 30s or 40s, after having got really disillusioned. One should try to secure ample enough time for study to the end of freeing your life.
      You may think I worry too much; your mother too, perhaps. She does, she is a mother -
      In Christianity the age-old emphasis is on achieving a proper fear God relationship, which may be sorely neglected today in some circles.
      Christian relationships may be too satanic, among other things because Jesus implies that "to be Christian is for sick persons only. The sound ones don't need a doctor." Hence, following a decent Eastern path focused on meditation may work better for you than hallucinogenic drug experiences and Christianity added to disheartening experiences. After one or two "bad trips," the heart may "go sour", thinking that all gurus are fakes, and so on. One should not go for re-experiencing the negative that poisoned, but some do it, regrettably.
      Don't let your experience with meditation be a burden to you. Hope to be able to consider other paths in an unprejudiced, civic manner. Don't let your experiences be so sickening that you turn to any satanic and too dogmatic "for sicko's only". Recognize who are your friends in time. Buddha offers helping guidance here. [LINK]
      Our psychological isolation is a challenge to meet the kind of persons that benefit us, benefit us deeply. During adulthood the forming of contacts is hardly as easy-going as in earlier years, but there are exceptions. Don't join a group for the sake of looking for a mate and uncivic companions that don't have a heart, and have too little worth to be called actual friends (Buddha, again).
      Many have got entangled with groups and leaders who lure them into systems of belief and practice and put on brakes of isolation from others too. Among those ignorant about spiritual goals and psychological manipulation, cultic groups seek to "contract" whoever they can by demagoguous skills that play on such as isolation, nervousness, no way out, and all too common insecurity. There are other yearnings they play on too. Some cults may in fact do well in salesmanship and public relations, even though they soon become dangerous enough for members and stop the recruit from looking elsewhere.
      An initially painful truth can be less painful and serve you far better than returning to a pleasant lie as a willy-nilly. It is no wonder that many cult victims or ex-members are depressed, lack self-esteem, and grieve.
      The difficulty of meeting for example young-adult life challenges in one's late 30s or 40s can cause such discouragement in some people that they retreat into holes instead of bringing more order into their lives.
      When depressed, seek to acknowledge this:

1. A vocation helps against despair many a time.

2. Be bold enough to have it your way. And, secondly, be bold enough to recognize that you have been discouraged, for that may well be a fact that you don't want to confront. Confidence to believe what suits yourself and not cult leaders is basic, and time to see it through. Critically reexamine many ideas that you may have held for a long time.

3. A long series of small steps, even baby steps, may be needed, Set about doing something sensible about what bothers you. But as you do, try to look behind the surfaces too, to avoid the stumbles. Look sweet enough; that often helps, especially women.

4. Apply principles and skills of problem solving to identify and evaluate optional strategies toward one or more of your true goal in life. This phase may be assisted by common-sense oriented therapy. [LINK A] [LINK B]
      The Adlerian approach of social learning assumes that problems may be solved or modified by recognition of them or their areas, or both, and then regulated a bit or more. In step with this, solutions nearly always require a series of strategic small steps toward one or more long-range goals. And especially initial progress should regularly be monitored and solution strategies altered for the sake of more success.
      With regard to vocation one can re-examine the possible directions to take and review the career options open. One may deliberate very carefully.
      Get to know enough. One may take adult education courses, join clubs, join museums and attend museum social events, and other such activities.
      Make extra effort to contact extended family members and old friends, even though most of them will be busy with their careers and families. Making friends (male and female) will most likely come from getting involved in social activities that are likely to be frequented by single people.
      Don't try mind-emptying techniques of meditation if you are too introverted. Ample rest could do you well. If you don't expect all too much, you may simply enjoy nature, happenings, meetings, and things as is convenient till you find somebody with whom you "click."
      A monastic life is suitable only for the few that feel great with having no sexual contacts and outlets. They live "old peoples' stage of life", one may say. They are a step from death, is another way of putting it.

5. Choose a suitable, realistic course of action, and don't look down on tavern people: Don't feel snub. Some there try to be comrades too.
      Some need to have good feelings about themselves through opinions as facts, but rise above it.
      Good intentions include getting old as someone of sterling worth too. To age with grace is no unattainable ideal today either. Nonetheless stay flexible and accept help as you need it.

TO TOP YOGA SET ROOT CONTENTS NEXT


 
Literature SECTION First Page E-MAIL

      Ak: Yogananda, Pa.: Man's Eternal Quest. Los Angeles: Self-Realization Fellowship, 1975.
      Ap: Mieder, Wolfgang (main editor), Stewart A. Kingsbury, and Kelsie E. Harder: A Dictionary of American Proverbs. (Paperback) New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
      Ay: Yogananda, Paramahansa. Autobiography of a Yogi. 1st ed. New York: Theosophical, 1946. Online. [oaks.nvg.org/pv6bk12.html]
      Clh: Dimmit, Cornelia and van Buitenen, J. A. B. trs: Classical Hindu Mythology. Temple University. Philadelphia, 1978.
      Ebu: Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica 2006 Ultimate Reference Suite DVD. London: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2006.
      Eswm: Asbjørnsen, Peter: East of the Sun and West of the Moon. Wordsworth Classics. Ware, 1995.
      Op: Simpson, John, and Jennifer Speake. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Proverbs. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
      Pa: Yogananda, Paramahansa. Autobiography of a Yogi. 11th ed. Los Angeles: Self-Realization Fellowship, 1971.
      Pan: Rajan, Chandra, tr: Visnu Sarma: The Panchatantra. Penguin Classics. London, 1995.
      Say: Yogananda, Paramahansa. Sayings of Yogananda. Los Angeles: Self-Realization Fellowship, 1958.
      Tm: Evans-Wentz, Walter Yeeling, ed. Tibet's Great Yogi Milarepa. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1969.
     
   CLICK on 'Literature' for the references of about 2000 works.
    ANNOTATIONS: Code letters (acronyms and initial words) in square brackets in the text refer to works. Click on 'Literature' to see examples. Page references are put right after code letters. And the abbreviation cf. means "compare". [MORE].
    SITE SEARCH: The 'Search' link gives access to dictionaries and more.
    REFER: Prefer the standard 'location address' on top of the page(s).
    PILOTING: Note the clickable text links on top of the page. [MORE]
    DISCLAIMER: Two disclaimers intertwine: [A] [B]
    © 2002–2006, Tormod Kinnes. All rights reserved — September 2006.